YOUR CHOICE OF WORDS
DOES MATTER!
Aberrosexualist Ideological Propaganda Terms, or Newspeak, Undermine the Pro-Marriage Cause
By New Era Communications Corp., Social Communications
Team
Nothing pleases more the enemies of the institution of
Marriage, than hoodwinking those defending this institution into undermining it
by adding adjectives that bastardize, distort, falsify
and relativize it.
Anti-Marriage extremists, or
aberrosexualists, understand well the impact of words on the battle’s outcome. They
understand that control of words, controls thoughts. Control of thoughts, controls actions. Control of actions, controls the future. This three-fold
formula by Italian Communist ideologue Antonio Gramsci is used
today by aberrosexualist ideologues to force on society the macabre ideology that pushes
the legalization of unhygienic, anatomically incorrect, biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choices.
Several decades ago, when aberrosexualist extremists began
their totalitarian assault against traditional Western concepts of human
sexuality, monogamous marriage and the family, they started off with the phrase
"homosexual marriage." This phrase soon morphed into the ideological
propaganda phrase “gay [sic] marriage.” It did not take long for them to develop,
through extensive message testing and focus group research, a "new, improved"
propaganda phrase: “marriage equality.”
Within months, aberrosexualist partisans throughout
the country had substituted the phrase “gay marriage” for the new one: “marriage
equality.” Pro-Marriage leaders, however, continue to naively use aberrosexualist ideological
propaganda terms, or Newspeak, as well as fail to communicate that marriage comes in only one version: the true one.
Is it any wonder that pro-Marriage leaders across the
nation are losing the battle? Is anyone really surprised that important sectors
of the pro-Marriage camp are falling under the relentless aberrosexualist ideological
propaganda bombardment?
Yet, in light of the legal and political defeats, and
the alarming erosion of public support for the institution of Marriage, too many
pro-Marriage leaders are in total denial of the immense damage they inflict to their cause by using enemy Newspeak. Incredibly, they refuse to acknowledge that use of enemy Newspeak is central to many of their
defeats.
Many pro-Marriage leaders suicidally ignore the important
role enemy Newspeak plays in controlling the thoughts that control the
actions that ultimately determine the outcome of the war being waged for the
heart, mind, and soul of America. Renowned Brazilian intellectual, Prof. Plinio
Correa de Oliveira warned that this Newspeak, whether used by Communists
of yesteryears or Aberrosexualists of today, invariably results in what he called “unperceived
ideological transshipment,” or brainwashing, simply put.
By ignoring their enemy’s rhetorical firepower or Newspeak,
pro-Marriage leaders are doomed to defeat before the battle even begins. All
modern propaganda wars rely on the astute manipulation of language to rhetorically
deceive, disarm, and ultimately destroy the enemy.
Conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh understood
this well when he said: “We lost the [marriage] issue when we started allowing
the word ‘marriage’ to be bastardized and redefined.” Indeed, humanity is
ill-served by bastardizing and redefining marriage with adjectives that
relativize and trivialize the word. There is no such
thing as “hetero marriage,” “gay marriage,” “traditional marriage,”
“non-traditional marriage,” “opposite-sex marriage,” or “same-sex marriage.” Marriage is either true or it’s
not!
Ideological falsifications of “marriage” undermine the
institution’s purpose, corrupt its meaning, and violate its essence. Respect for
the institution of Marriage, therefore, demands that no adjective be added to the noun. And should
we ever need to distinguish true marriage from its impostors, let’s simply
refer to it as true or real marriage. All other
adjectives either distort its meaning or muddy the waters.
SEVEN KEY POINTS REGARDING
THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE
1. Gay
means delightful, happy, joyful; not aberrosexual or same-sex. All
marriages should be gay, but not aberrosexual or same-sex. Marriage requires a
husband and a wife. Two men can’t get “married” any more than
they can get a hysterectomy. Two
women can’t get “married” any more than they can get a prostatectomy.
2. Aberrosexualist
extremists, those forcing society to accept biologically aberrant sexual
behavioral choices, are not really interested in marriage. Through
the flagrant judicial violation of constitutional equal protection, due process
and voting rights, aberrosexualists seek to undemocratically force society to
accept biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choices, or aberrosexualism, as “normal,”
“healthy,” and “sane.”
3. Marriage is either TRUE or FAKE..
There’s really no such thing as “gay [sic] marriage,” “traditional marriage,”
“non-traditional marriage,” “opposite-sex marriage,” or “same-sex marriage.’’ Same-sex
so-called "marriage" is an ideologically-contrived legal
fiction that violates true marriage’s purpose, corrupts true marriage’s
meaning, and disrespects true marriage’s essence. Respect for Marriage demands
that no adjectives be added to the name.
4. Since
the dawn of civilization, the marital embrace, or sexual intercourse, i.e., the
penetration of opposite sexual organs*, is required to legally consummate a marriage.
Because it’s biologically impossible for two same-sex individuals
to have sexual intercourse, or maritally embrace, the ideologically-contrived
legal fraud (a fraud created to impose an ideology), of same-sex so-called
“marriage” is just that, a fraud and a hoax!
5. In
plain English, discrimination means treating unequally those who are equal.
In America, marriage license applications never ask anyone’s sexual behavioral
choices or preferences. Full marriage equality is a reality in all 50 states as
all Americans enjoy the same equal right to marry under the same equal rules
and conditions. Can anyone sanely say two men or two women equal one man and
one woman? Treating two men or two women differently from one man and one woman
can never be discrimination.
6. The institution of Marriage is a matter
of public policy, not constitutional law. No U.S. Supreme Court
holding, precedent or authority exists to strike down a state’s constitutional or
statutory respect for the institution of Marriage as the union of one man and
one woman. None! Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito states in United States v. Windsor (12-307), (2013):
“same-sex marriage presents a highly emotional and important question of public
policy – but not a difficult question of constitutional law.”
7. There is absolutely no constitutional right
to same-sex so-called “marriage”. In United States v. Windsor, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito wrote:
“The Constitution does not guarantee the right to enter into a same-sex
marriage. Indeed, no provision of the Constitution speaks to the issue.”
* Those that engage in anatomically incorrect, biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choices
may argue that penile penetration of another man’s rectum somehow constitutes
sexual intercourse. The rectum, however, is not a sexual organ. The rectum is a
gastrointestinal organ. Sexual intercourse requires the penetration of opposite
sexual organs, not the penetration of the rectum or any other non-sexual organ,
object or thing.
Please share this with your relatives, friends, and neighbors.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
REMEMBER
The truth has never stood in the way of ideological
fanatics, any more than reality has ever stood in the way of delusional
psychotics.
© 2014
New Era Communications, Inc.
