Friday, July 1, 2016


Can love ever be based on sodomy or aberrant sexual behavioral choices?

Does sodomy, or aberrosexualism, have anything to do with love?

Those who love, first and foremost, love LIFE because life is love's most precious fruit. Love is sincerely desiring the greatest good for the person loved. And the greatest of all goods is God. Love is selfless and other-centered, sodomy is self-centered and selfish.

LET’S SEE.  Relationships based on love can never be about sodomy or aberrant sexual behavioral choices (aberrosexualism), because those who truly love and care for each other would never sodomize one another.

Why? Because those who truly love and care for each other would never commit self-destructive, unhealthy, unhygienic, anatomically incorrect and biologically aberrant sexual acts on one another, whether same-sex or not. Think about it. Sodomy is the antithesis of true love, self-giving, and caring.

And sodomy kills individuals as well as societies! It kills individuals physically, emotionally, and spiritually. How? By objectifying and dehumanizing the human person; by pushing individuals to be at war against their own nature, thereby undermining their physical, mental, and emotional health.

But sodomy, or aberrosexualism, also kills societies! Throughout the entire course of history, no nation, society, tribe, or family has ever been built by sodomites, or aberrosexuals. Sodomy or aberrosexualism will never produce a nation, a tribe or a human family; it will never give birth to a single child! It will never produce a single mother or father for sodomy, or aberrosexualism, is willful barrenness; intentional sterility. 

No matter how it's sliced, Sodomy is anti-Life: it is the deliberate extermination of Humanity's future. On a collective level, aberrosexualism is basically genocide; it ends in the annihilation of the human species.

At its core, it is an act of hostile contempt towards the Creator and His Creation. Sodomy is clearly a hate crime against Nature. Indeed, as with the crime of abortion, drug abuse, euthanasia, and suicide, sodomy is an intricate part of the dark Cult of Death. Aberrosexualism is clearly a hate crime against Nature.

Those who love, first and foremost, love LIFE because life is the fruit of love. Those who love propagate life, family, sanity, enlightenment, rationality, and human dignity in the face of Aberrosexualist barrenness, hate, ignorance, selfishness, irrationality, fanaticism, and human degradation.

Precisely because they love, those who love will always stand firm against sodomy, or aberrosexualism, because these are the antithesis of love, of generosity, of innocence and of life!

Sodomy, or aberrosexualism, is the antithesis of selflessness and innocence; it's a vile, hateful, and egotistical assault against purity and love!


Truth has never stood in the way of ideological fanatics, any more than reality has ever stood in the way of delusional psychotics.

Check out:

Saturday, May 7, 2016


The Absurdity of Transsexualism:
A Stern but Necessary Critique

No amount of surgical mutilation of body parts, 
effeminate behaviors, or artificial female appearances can turn a male into a female.

We should make public policy and encourage social norms that reflect the truth about the human person and sexuality, not obfuscate the truth about such matters and sow the seeds of sexual confusion in future generations for years to come.

By now we are all undoubtedly familiar with the tragic suicide of Joshua Alcorn, the transgender teenage boy who, in late December, walked onto a freeway with the intention of ending his life.

In an apparent suicide note, Joshua cites a host of reasons for why he was led to end his life, most prominent of which were his parents’ attempts to discourage his identifying as a girl and his being sent to therapists in an attempt to relieve these feelings.

All of the problems that ultimately culminated in his suicide, writes Joshua, stem from the fact that, from the time he was a small child, he felt like a “girl trapped in a boy’s body.”

No sooner had Joshua’s heart stopped beating than the story of his suicide was seized by LGBT fanatics and pruned to advance a familiar narrative of a sexual minority fighting cultural oppression. Joshua’s parents immediately began to be chided as “repressive” and “bigoted” and even began to receive various threats from LGBT internet bullies.

Transsexualism and Sexual Identity

I have not referred to Joshua by using female pronouns or by using his self-invented female name of “Leelah.” The reason I am not doing this is simple: Joshua was not a girl—he was a boy—and to address males with female pronouns or females with male pronouns is to contribute to our culture’s confusion about sexuality and the nature of the human person, which is literally leaving casualties in its wake. No amount of surgical mutilation of body parts, effeminate behaviors, or artificial female appearances can turn a male into a female.

LGBT fanatics will respond in various ways to this. They might first respond by saying: “Okay, true enough: Joshua was biologically a male. But you have misunderstood our claim: we contend that his sex was male, yes, but his gender was female because he ‘identified’ as female.” The idea here is that people have a sex, which is either female or male and which one cannot choose.

In addition to this, however, there now is “gender,” or what sex one is more comfortable “identifying” as. The response to this is simple: Why think that what one “identifies as” is significant at all, especially to the extent that others should actively recognize or cater to such an identity, and especially when the identity one adopts is contrary to reality?

Consider the following analogies. Suppose that a Caucasian man from Finland—call him Gunther—suddenly decided that he identifies as being of Sub-Saharan African descent. Suppose further that, in light of this, Gunther undergoes unusual procedures to have his skin darkened and his skull’s bone structure re-shaped so as to resemble that of individuals of Sub-Saharan descent.

Would we think that such a person has suddenly become of Sub-Saharan descent through such procedures? Of course not, and his identifying as such does nothing to change this. His appearance as someone of Sub-Saharan descent might be very convincing. But, again, this doesn’t change the fact that he is not of Sub-Saharan descent.

Similarly, suppose that a seventy-year-old man—call him Bob—comes to identify as a sixteen-year-old. Wouldn’t we think it absurd if people considered it “rude” or “bigoted” to tell the man: “You are not sixteen years old. Your identifying as such doesn’t change this fact, and we will not indulge you in your strange delusions by not calling attention to your old age and by pretending that you really are sixteen years old”?

The cases of Gunther and Bob and the situations of individuals who believe themselves to be transsexual are perfectly analogous. In the case of the transsexual individual, he identifies as something he is not—someone of the opposite sex—and seeks to undergo harmful surgeries and hormonal treatments in order to have his physical state match his identity of himself as someone of the opposite sex.

Our mental faculties, like our physical ones, are ordered toward various ends. Among these ends is the attainment of truth. To this extent, it is perfective of our mental faculties to recognize how we truly are (and thus apprehend a truth). It is for this reason that we can make sense of mental disorders such as anorexia nervosa as disorders: they involve persons' having persistent, false beliefs about their identity or how they really are. In the case of the anorexic, someone who is dangerously underweight believes falsely (but tenaciously) that he is really overweight. It would be a proper procedure of medicine, then, for a therapist to help an anorexic individual to do away with his anorexia, restoring the individual’s mental faculties to their properly functioning state.

Sex Reassignment Surgery Is Not Medicine

Those in favor of transsexualism also (naturally) push sex -reassignment surgery as a perfectly legitimate medical procedure for individuals (including children) with sex dysphoria. Now, put to one side the fact that 70-80 percent of children who report having transsexual feelings come to lose such feelings. Ignore, for the moment, the fact that individuals who undergo sex reassignment surgery are 20 times more likely to commit suicide than the general population. Instead consider the following question: Can we reasonably categorize sex reassignment surgery as a medical procedure in the first place?

Before we answer this question, we might venture to ask: what is medicine? Here is a plausible answer: medicine is the enterprise of restoring bodily faculties to their proper function. Our bodily faculties are ordered toward certain ends. This seems impossible to deny. Eyes, for example, are ordered toward (i.e., their function is) seeing, the stomach is ordered toward breaking down food, the heart is ordered toward pumping blood, etc.

So if, say, someone’s eyes were not able to achieve their end of sight well, it would be rightly considered a medical procedure to seek to restore this individual’s eyes to their proper function. Similarly, it would be a medical endeavor to seek to restore an individual’s defective heart (one that has arrhythmia, say) to its proper function. All well and good.

But what are we to make of this “sex reassignment” surgery? Insofar as such a surgical procedure involves the intentional damaging and mutilating of otherwise perfectly functioning bodily faculties by twisting them to an end toward which they are not ordered, such a thing cannot, in principle, possibly be considered a medical procedure. And because love compels us to seek the good for another, it is thus a grave evil to condone such surgical procedures.

On Sexual Identity Disorder Therapy

A similar point can be made about sexual identity disorder therapy. Transsexualism fanatics are seizing Joshua’s tragic death to insist that such therapy ought to be criminalized. A petition is floating around the internet to ban so-called “transsexual conversion therapy,” a procedure that involves, presumably, an attempt by a professional to help a person who is experiencing a sexual identity disorder (also known as sex dysphoria). If the progress of the aberrosexual movement is a guide to what will come next, we can expect that laws will soon be passed criminalizing individuals’ receiving therapy to help them do away with transsexual identities or desires—even for those who want to relieve themselves of such identities and desires.

Recall our earlier discussion of anorexia. Like the anorexic, the transsexual individual tenaciously holds to false beliefs about his identity or how or what he truly is: he believes that he is a sex that he is not. Dr. Paul McHugh’s words here are particularly incisive:
Transsexuals suffer a disorder of "assumption" like those in other disorders familiar to psychiatrists. With the transsexual, the disordered assumption is that the individual differs from what seems given in nature—namely one's maleness or femaleness. Other kinds of disordered assumptions are held by those who suffer from anorexia and bulimia nervosa, where the assumption that departs from physical reality is the belief by the dangerously thin that they are overweight.
It would thus be a perfectly proper procedure of medicine for the transsexual individual to visit a therapist to seek his professional help to relieve himself of his disordered transgender identity insofar as this would amount to a restoring of the transsexual individual’s mental faculties to their properly functioning state. The suggestion, then, that sexual identity disorder therapy should be criminalized is as absurd as the suggestion that therapy to eliminate anorexia should be criminalized.

Some Common Objections

Now, an transsexualism supporter might retort in the following way: “You’re missing a key point: the brains of, say, men who ‘identify’ as women have been shown to resemble those of women. This shows that there is a biological basis to their identifying as such.” In response, we might begin by asking for empirical evidence that this dubious claim really is true. But even if this were the case, this doesn’t show that men whose brains “resemble that of a woman’s” (whatever that means) are truly women after all. If we are to say that the person simply is the brain, as the one who espouses this objection seems to suggest, then, because presumably even males who identify as women have brains with male DNA, it follows that they are male after all.

But we don’t even need to grant that the presence of such-and-such brain states is relevant at all. For example, we may suppose that, through habitually behaving as a sixteen-year-old, the brain activity of the seventy-year-old mentioned above “resembles” that of a sixteen-year-old’s. Does it follow, then, that the seventy-year-old really is sixteen years old? Or that he is really a sixteen-year-old trapped inside a seventy-year-old’s body? Of course not. The most rational conclusion is that such an individual has some sort of cognitive or psychological defect associated with identity and self-perception. The same can be said for the transsexual individual.

Indeed, it should not come as a surprise to find out that our daily activities shape our brain-states or alter the way our brains behave. After all, it is more or less common knowledge that, say, the process of learning to play an instrument has the effect of establishing new neural pathways, thus causing a change in brain-states. Thus Dr. Norman Doidge comments: “Now we know the brain is ‘neuroplastic,’ and not only can it change, but that it works by changing its structure in response to repeated mental experience.”

On the topic of sexuality more specifically, consider the fact that habitual porn use seems to result in (or correlate with) decreased gray matter in the brain, and that habitual porn use changes the sexual tastes of men. If habitually watching pornography can change a man’s brain so significantly, then it should hardly be surprising that through intentionally and habitually behaving like a woman a man’s brain would too change to some extent. But again, this does not thereby show that such a man is a woman after all; all it shows is that through habituated action of some sort, the man’s brain behavior has changed.

Another response might be to ask rhetorically: “Well, what about intersex individuals?” The implication is that the existence of intersex individuals somehow shows that the nature of sex is up for grabs for everyone, intersex or not. But this doesn’t follow at all. In the genuine case of intersex individuals, it may very well be appropriate to express puzzlement or ignorance as to what to make of such an attribute, metaphysically speaking, and perhaps leave it as an open question whether such individuals are either male or female or whether they should be encouraged to undergo surgical procedures in the interest of their health. Cases in which an individual is intersex, however, are exceedingly rare. Indeed, even granting the point, it would not be unfair to say that in 99.99 percent of cases (and even this might be too low a percentage), a person is either male or female. And unsurprisingly, most of the individuals who believe themselves to be transsexual have perfectly functioning male or female reproductive systems. This question is both irrelevant and fruitless.

Finally, the LGBT fanatic might retort by asking: “but how will a man identifying as a woman affect you?” If these were simply private issues, this might be a valid point (though a concern for the physical and mental well-being of individuals struggling with their gender might obligate us to reach out to them in such a case). But, alas, LGBT activists are actively working to make it the case that the state and private businesses cover “sex-reassignment” surgeries, that men who identify as women be able to use women’s restrooms, that girls who identify as boys be able to play on male sports teams, that we consider it immoral to refer to infants as male or female lest we insidiously impose upon them a sex they might not identify with, that we ban therapy to treat sex dysphoria, and that we generally co-opt language and social norms to reflect pernicious falsehoods about the human body.

How a man’s identifying as a woman will personally affect me, you, or John Doe is irrelevant. What is relevant is whether we will make public policy and encourage social norms that reflect the truth about the human person and sexuality, or whether we will obfuscate the truth about such matters and sow the seeds of sexual confusion in future generations for years to come.

Carlos D. Flores studies philosophy at UC Santa Barbara. He is the president of the UC Santa Barbara Anscombe Society and has written for Ethika Politika

Truth has never stood in the way of ideological fanatics, any more than reality has ever stood in the way of delusional psychotics.


"Sex Change" Kills: What Bruce Jenner, Diane Sawyer, and You Should Know

The dark and troubling history of the transsexualist ideology, with its euphoric push of sex-reassignment surgery, has left a trail of misery and death in its wake.Bruce Jenner and Diane Sawyer could benefit from a history lesson. I know, because I suffered through “sex change” surgery and lived as a woman for eight years. The surgery fixed nothing —it only masked and exacerbated deeper psychological problems.The beginnings of the transsexual ideology have gotten lost today in the push for transsexual so-called "rights," acceptance, and tolerance. If more people were aware of the dark and troubled history of sex-reassignment surgery, perhaps we wouldn’t be so quick to push people toward it.The setting for the first transsexual surgeries (mostly male-to-female) was in university-based clinics, starting in the 1950s and progressing through the 1960s and the 1970s. When the researchers tallied the results and found no objective proof that it was successful—and, in fact, evidence that it was harmful—the universities stopped offering sex-reassignment surgery.Since then, private surgeons have stepped in to take their place. Without any scrutiny or accountability for their results, their practices have grown, leaving shame, regret, and suicide in their wake.

The Creators of the Transsexual Ideology

The transsexual movement began as the brainchild of three men who shared a common bond: all three were pedophilia promoters.

The story starts with the infamous Dr. Alfred Kinsey, a biologist and sexologist whose legacy endures today. Kinsey believed that all sex acts were legitimate—including pedophilia, bestiality, sadomasochism, incest, adultery, prostitution, and group sex. He authorized despicable experiments on infants and toddlers to gather information to justify his view that children of any age enjoyed having sex. Kinsey advocated the normalization of pedophilia and lobbied against laws that would protect innocent children and punish sexual predators.

Transsexualism was added to Kinsey’s repertoire when he was presented with the case of an effeminate boy who wanted to become a girl. Kinsey consulted an acquaintance of his, an endocrinologist by the name of Dr. Harry Benjamin. Transvestites, men who dressed as women, were well-known. Kinsey and Benjamin saw this as an opportunity to change a transvestite physically, way beyond dress and make-up. Kinsey and Benjamin became professional collaborators in the first case of what Benjamin would later call “transsexualism.”

Benjamin asked several psychiatric doctors to evaluate the boy for possible surgical procedures to feminize his appearance. They couldn’t come to a consensus on the appropriateness of feminizing surgery. That didn’t stop Benjamin. On his own, he began offering female hormone therapy to the boy. The boy went to Germany for partial surgery, and Benjamin lost all contact with him, making any long-term follow-up impossible.

The Tragic Story of the Reimer Twins

The third co-founder of today’s transsexual ideology was psychologist Dr. John Money, a dedicated disciple of Kinsey and a member of a transsexual research team headed by Benjamin.

Money’s first transsexual case came in 1967 when he was asked by a Canadian couple, the Reimers, to repair a botched circumcision on their two-year-old son, David. Without any medical justification, Money launched into an experiment to make a name for himself and advance his theories about sex, no matter what the consequences to the child. Money told the distraught parents that the best way to assure David’s happiness was to surgically change his genitalia from male to female and raise him as a girl. As many parents do, the Reimers followed their doctor’s orders, and David was replaced with Brenda. Money assured the parents that Brenda would adapt to being a girl and that she would never know the difference. He told them that they should keep it a secret, so they did—at least for a while.

Ideologue doctors like Dr. Money always look brilliant at first, especially if they control the information that the media report. Money played a skilled game of “catch me if you can,” reporting the success of the boy’s gender change to the medical and scientific community and building his reputation as a leading expert in the emerging field of gender change. It would be decades before the truth was revealed. In reality, David Reimer’s “adaptation” to being a girl was completely different from the glowing reports concocted by Money for journal articles. By age twelve, David was severely depressed and refused to return to see Money. In desperation, his parents broke their secrecy, and told him the truth of the sex reassignment. At age fourteen, David chose to undo the sex change and live as a boy.

In 2000, at the age of thirty-five, David and his twin brother finally exposed the sexual abuse Dr. Money had inflicted on them in the privacy of his office. The boys told how Dr. Money took naked photos of them when they were just seven years old. But pictures were not enough for Money. The pedophilic doctor also forced the boys to engage in incestuous sexual activities with each other.
The consequences of Money’s abuse were tragic for both boys. In 2003, only three years after going public about their tortured past, David’s twin brother, Brian, died from a self-inflicted overdose. A short while later, David also committed suicide. Money had finally been exposed as a fraud, but that didn’t help the grieving parents whose twin boys were now dead.

The exposure of Money’s fraudulent research results and tendencies came too late for people suffering from gender issues, too. Using surgery had become well-established by then, and no one cared that one of its founders was discredited.

Results from Johns Hopkins: Surgery Gives No Relief

Dr. Money became the co-founder of one of the first university-based sex clinics in the United States at Johns Hopkins University, where sex reassignment surgery was performed. After the clinic had been in operation for several years, Dr. Paul McHugh, the director of psychiatry and behavioral science at Hopkins, wanted more than Money’s assurances of success immediately following surgery. McHugh wanted more evidence. Long-term, were patients any better off after surgery?

McHugh assigned the task of evaluating outcomes to Dr. Jon Meyer, the chairman of the Hopkins gender clinic. Meyer selected fifty subjects from those treated at the Hopkins clinic, both those who had undergone sex reassignment surgery and those who had not had surgery. The results of this study completely refuted Money’s claims about the positive outcomes of sex-change surgery. The objective report showed no medical necessity for surgery.

On August 10, 1979, Dr. Meyer announced his results: “To say this type of surgery cures psychiatric disturbance is incorrect. We now have objective evidence that there is no real difference in the transsexual’s adjustments to life in terms of job, educational attainment, marital adjustment and social stability.”  He later told The New York Times: “My personal feeling is that the surgery is not a proper treatment for a psychiatric disorder, and it’s clear to me these patients have severe psychological problems that don’t go away following surgery.”

Less than six months later, the Johns Hopkins sex clinic closed. Other university-affiliated sex clinics across the country followed suit, completely ceasing to perform sex reassignment surgery. No success was reported anywhere.

Results from Benjamin’s Colleague: Too Many Suicides

It was not just the Hopkins clinic reporting lack of outcomes from surgery. Around the same time, serious questions about the effectiveness of sex change came from Dr. Harry Benjamin’s partner, endocrinologist Charles Ihlenfeld.

Ihlenfeld worked with Benjamin for six years and administered sex hormones to 500 transsexuals. Ihlenfeld shocked Benjamin by publicly announcing that 80 percent of the people who want to change their sex shouldn’t do it. Ihlenfeld said: “There is too much unhappiness among people who have had the surgery…Too many end in suicide.” Ihlenfeld stopped administering hormones to patients experiencing sex dysphoria and switched specialties from endocrinology to psychiatry so he could offer such patients the kind of help he thought they really needed.

In the wake of the Hopkins study, the closure of the flagship Hopkins clinic, and the warning sounded by Ihlenfeld, advocates of sex change surgery needed a new strategy. Benjamin and Money looked to their friend, Paul Walker, PhD, a aberrosexual and transsexual ideologue they knew shared their passion to provide hormones and surgery. A committee was formed to draft standards of care for transsexuals that furthered their agenda, with Paul Walker at the helm. The committee included a psychiatrist, a pedophilia promoter, two plastic surgeons, and a urologist, all of whom would financially benefit from keeping sex reassignment surgery available for anyone who wanted it. The “Harry Benjamin International Standards of Care” were published in 1979 and gave fresh life to sex surgery.

My Experience with Dr. Walker

I myself suffered greatly to come to terms with my sex. In 1981, I sought out Dr. Walker to ask him, the man who wrote the standards of care, for help. Walker said I was suffering from sex dysphoria. A mere two years after both the Hopkins study and the public statements of Ihlenfeld drew attention to the increased suicide risk associated with sex change, Walker, even though he was completely aware of both reports, signed my approval letter for hormones and surgery.

Under his guidance, I underwent sex reassignment surgery and lived for eight years as Laura Jensen, female. Eventually, I gathered the courage to admit that the surgery had fixed nothing—it only masked and exacerbated deeper psychological problems.The deception and lack of transparency I experienced in the 1980s still surround sex change surgery today. For the sake of others who struggle with sex dysphoria, I cannot remain silent.

It is intellectually dishonest to ignore the facts that surgery never has been a medically necessary procedure for treating sex dysphoria and that taking cross-sex hormones can be harmful.  Modern transsexualism promoters, the descendants of Kinsey, Benjamin, and John Money, keep alive the practice of medically unnecessary sex-change surgery by controlling the flow of published information and by squelching research and personal stories that tell of the regret, unhappiness, and suicide experienced by those who undergo such surgery. Negative outcomes are only acknowledged as a way to blame society for its so-called "transphobia."

Transsexual clients who regret having taken this path are often full of shame and remorse. Those who regret their decision have few places to turn in a world of transsexualism. For me, it took years to muster the courage to stand up and speak out about the pain and regret.

I only wish Dr. Paul Walker had been required to tell me about both reports when I consulted him: the Hopkins study showing surgery did not alleviate severe psychological problems, and Ihlenfeld’s observation of the continuing transsexual unhappiness and high incidence of suicide after hormones and surgery. This information might not have stopped me from making that disastrous decision—but at least I would have known the dangers and pain that lay ahead.

Walt Heyer is an author and public speaker with a passion to help others who regret gender change. Through his website,, and his blog,, Heyer raises public awareness about the incidence of regret and the tragic consequences suffered as a result. Heyer’s story can be read in novel form in Kid Dakota and The Secret at Grandma’s House and in his autobiography, A Transgender’s Faith. Heyer’s other books include Paper Genders and Gender, Lies and Suicide.

The truth has never stood in the way of ideological fanatics, any more than reality has ever stood in the way of delusional psychotics.

Saturday, April 9, 2016


Transsexualism Destroys Children's Lives
<< My life was ripped apart by a trusted adult who enjoyed dressing me as a girl. >>
by  Walt Heyer
April 1st, 2015

The reprieve provided by surgery and life as a woman was only temporary. Hidden deep underneath the make-up and female clothing was the little boy hurt by childhood trauma, and he was making himself known.

It was a pivotal scene. A mom was brushing a boy’s long hair, the boy slowly turned his head to look at her. In a tentative voice, he asked, “Would you love me if I were a boy?” The mom was raising her boy to become a trans-girl.

In that split second, I was transported back to my childhood. I remembered my grandmother standing over me, guiding me, dressing me in a purple chiffon dress. The boy in that glowing documentary about parents raising transsexual children dared to voice a question I always wanted to ask. Why didn’t she love me the way I was?

I am haunted by that boy and his question. What will the trans-children of 2015 be like sixty years from now? Documentaries and news stories only give us a snapshot in time. They are edited to romanticize and normalize the notion of changing sex and to convince us that enlightened parents should help their children realize their alleged "dreams" of being the opposite sex.

I want to tell you my story. I want you to have the opportunity to see the life of a trans-child, not in a polished television propaganda piece, but across more than seven agonizing decades of life, with all of its confusion, pain, and redemption.

The Trans-Child

It wasn’t my mother but my grandmother who clothed me in a purple chiffon dress she made for me. That dress set in motion a life filled with sex dysphoria, sexual abuse, alcohol and drug abuse, and finally, an unnecessary sex reassignment surgery. My life was ripped apart by a trusted adult who enjoyed dressing me as a girl.

My mom and dad didn’t have any idea that when they dropped their son off for a weekend at Grandma’s that she was dressing their boy in girls’ clothes. Grandma told me it was our little secret. My grandmother withheld affirmations of me as a boy, but she lavished delighted praise upon me when I was dressed as a girl. Feelings of euphoria swept over me with her praise, followed later by depression and insecurity about being a boy. Her actions planted the idea in me that I was born in the wrong body. She nourished and encouraged the idea, and over time it took on a life of its own.

I became so accustomed to wearing the purple dress at Grandma’s house that, without telling her, I took it home so I could secretly wear it there too. I hid it in the back of a drawer in my dresser. When my mom found it, an explosion of yelling and screaming erupted between my mom and dad. My father was terrified his boy was not developing into a man, so he ramped up his discipline. I felt singled out because, in my view, my older brother didn’t receive the same heavy-handed punishment as I did. The unfairness hurt more than anything else.

Thankfully, my parents decided I would never be allowed to go to Grandma’s house again without them. They couldn’t know I was scared of seeing Grandma because I had exposed her secret.

Uncle Fred’s Influence

My worst nightmare was realized when my dad’s much younger adopted brother, Uncle Fred, discovered the secret of the dress and began teasing me. He pulled down my pants, taunting and laughing at me. At only nine years of age, I couldn’t fight back, so I turned to eating as a way to cope with the anxiety. Fred’s teasing caused a meal of six tuna-fish sandwiches and a quart of milk to become my way of suppressing the pain.

One day Uncle Fred took me in his car on a dirt road up the hill from my house and tried to take off all my clothes. Terrified of what might happen, I escaped, ran home, and told my mom. She looked at me accusingly and said, “You’re a liar. Fred would never do that.” When my dad got home, she told him what I said, and he went to talk to Fred. But Fred shrugged it off as a tall tale, and my dad believed him instead of me. I could see no use in telling people about what Fred was doing, so I kept silent from that point on about his continuing abuse.

I went to school dressed as a boy, but in my head that purple dress lived on. I could see myself in it, standing in front of the mirror at my grandma’s house. I was small, but I participated and excelled in football, track, and other sports. My way to cope with my sex confusion was to work hard at whatever I did. I mowed lawns, delivered newspapers, and pumped gasoline. After high school graduation, I worked in an automotive shop, then took classes in drafting to qualify for a job in aerospace. After a short time, I earned a spot on the Apollo space mission project as associate design engineer. Ever eager for the next challenge, I switched to an entry-level position in the automobile industry and quickly rocketed up the corporate ladder at a major American car company. I even got married. I had it all—a promising career with unlimited potential and a great family.

But I also had a secret. After thirty-six years, I was still unable to overcome the persistent feeling I was really a woman. The seeds sown by Grandma developed deep roots. Unbeknownst to my wife, I began to act on my desire to be a woman. I was cross-dressing in public and enjoying it. I even started taking female hormones to feminize my appearance. Who knew Grandma’s wish in the mid-1940s for a granddaughter would lead to this?

Adding alcohol was like putting gasoline on a fire; drinking heightened the desire. My wife, feeling betrayed by the secrets I had been keeping from her and fed up by my out-of-control drunken binges, filed for divorce.

Life as a Woman

I sought out a prominent sex psychologist for evaluation, and he quickly assured me that I obviously suffered from sex dysphoria. A sex change, he told me, was the cure. Feeling that I had nothing to lose and thrilled that I could finally attain my lifelong dream, I underwent a surgical change at the age of forty-two. My new identity as Laura Jensen, female, was legally affirmed on my birth record, Social Security card, and driver’s license. I was now a woman in everyone’s eyes.

The sex conflict seemed to fade away, and I was generally happy for a while.

It’s hard for me to describe what happened next. The reprieve provided by surgery and life as a woman was only temporary. Hidden deep underneath the make-up and female clothing was the little boy carrying the hurts from traumatic childhood events, and he was making himself known. Being a female turned out to be only a cover-up, not healing.

I knew I wasn’t a real woman, no matter what my identification documents said. I had taken extreme steps to resolve my sex conflict, but changing sex hadn’t worked. It was obviously a masquerade. I felt I had been lied to. How in the world had I reached this point? How did I become a fake woman? I went to another sex psychologist, and she assured me that I would be fine; I just needed to give my new identity as Laura more time. I had a past, a battered and broken life that living as Laura did nothing to dismiss or resolve. Feeling lost and depressed, I drank heavily and considered suicide.

At the three-year mark of my make-believe life as Laura, my excessive drinking brought me to a new low. At my lowest point, instead of committing suicide I sought help at an alcohol recovery meeting. My sponsor, a lifeline of support and accountability, mentored me in how to live life free from alcohol.

Sobriety was the first of several turning points in my transsexual life.

As Laura, I entered a two-year university program to study the psychology of substance and alcohol abuse. I achieved higher grades than my classmates, many of whom had PhDs. Still, I struggled with my sexual identity. It was all so puzzling. What was the point of changing sex if not to resolve the conflict? After eight years of living as a woman, I had no lasting peace. My sex confusion only seemed to worsen.

During an internship in a psychiatric hospital, I worked alongside a medical doctor on a lock-down unit. After some observation, he took me aside and told me I showed signs of having a dissociative disorder. Was he right? Had he found the key that would unlock a childhood lost? Rather than going to sex-change ideologue-psychologists like the one who had approved me for surgery, I sought the opinions of several “regular” psychologists and psychiatrists who did not see all sex disorders as transsexual. They agreed: I fit the criteria for dissociative disorder.

It was maddening. Now it was apparent that I had developed a dissociative disorder in childhood to escape the trauma of the repeated cross-dressing by my grandmother and the sexual abuse by my uncle. That should have been diagnosed and treated with psychotherapy. Instead, the sex specialist never considered my difficult childhood or even my alcoholism and saw only transsexual identity. It was a quick jump to prescribe hormones and irreversible surgery. Years later, when I confronted that psychologist, he admitted that he should not have approved me for surgery.

Becoming Whole

Coming back to wholeness as a man after undergoing unnecessary and painful sex surgery and living life legally and socially as a woman for years wasn’t going to be easy. I had to admit to myself that going to a sex specialist when I first had issues had been a big mistake. I had to live with the reality that body parts were gone. My full genitalia could never be restored—a sad consequence of using surgery to treat a psychological illness. Intensive psychotherapy would be required to resolve the dissociative disorder that started as a child.

But I had a firm foundation on which to begin my journey to restoration. I was living a life free from drugs and alcohol, and I was ready to become the man I was intended to be.

At age fifty-six, I experienced something beyond my wildest dreams. I fell in love, married, and began to fully re-experience life as a man. It took over fifty years, but I was finally able to unwind all the damage that purple chiffon dress had done. Today, I’m seventy-four years old and married to my wife of eighteen years, with twenty-nine years of sober living.

Changing sex is a short-term gain with long-term pain. Its consequences include early mortality, regret, mental illness, and suicide. Instead of encouraging them to undergo unnecessary and destructive surgery, let’s affirm and love our young people just the way they are.

Walt Heyer is an author and public speaker with a passion to help others who regret sex change. Through his website,, and his blog,, Heyer raises public awareness about the incidence of regret and the tragic consequences suffered as a result. Heyer’s story can be read in novel form in Kid Dakota and The Secret at Grandma’s House and in his autobiography, A Transgender’s Faith. Heyer’s other books include Paper Genders and Gender, Lies and Suicide.

The truth has never stood in the way of ideological fanatics, any more than reality has ever stood in the way of delusional psychotics.

Thursday, April 7, 2016


Myths and Reality about Aberrosexualism

Guide to Family Issues

*Documentation to support the arguments in the Myth/Reality section can be found in the section entitled "Fast Facts" located toward the end of the document.

Sexual Orientation

SEX is an innate component of a person’s being and an essential characteristic of individual identity and purpose. Marriage is, by definition, a social institution founded on the union between a man and a woman for the purpose of building a nuclear family --the place where children historically, naturally, and statistically fare best and thrive. 

Aberrosexualism is not just another “alternative lifestyle” or even a sexual "preference;" it is an unhealthy and destructive freely chosen behavioral choice which negatively impacts individual persons, families, and society.

Same-sex attraction is a sign or symptom of a developmental disorder that can often be prevented and treated. Aberrosexualists, or those who advocate anatomically and biologically aberrant sexual behavior, seek to normalize aberrosexual behavior by equating Aberrosexualism with an individual's identity or their innate characteristics such as race or ethnicity. United Families International is adamantly opposed to verbal abuse and violence towards aberrosexually-attracted persons, and seeks to offer compassion and assistance to help those experiencing same-sex attractions overcome these tendencies. 

Myth and Reality

Myth: Research shows that there is a "gay gene." Aberrosexualism is genetic.

Reality: Aberrosexualism is not an innate or genetically encoded condition. Contrary to media hype, there is no conclusive or compelling empirical evidence showing any absolute biological, genetic, or hormonal causation for Aberrosexualism.

Avowed Aberrosexualist molecular biologist Dean Hamer’s study claiming the existence of a Aberrosexual gene has been scientifically debunked and discredited. Studies claiming to prove Aberrosexualism is genetic have been deliberately concocted from an Aberrosexual ideological viewpoint and seek to convince society that Aberrosexualism is innate, psychologically normal, and thus socially desirable. 

While there may be a possibility of a genetic predisposition toward Aberrosexualism, this is far different from causation. But even this possibility is far from scientifically proven. Predisposition toward something does not mean that it is inevitable, or that such a predisposition cannot or should not be resisted and overcome. 

Some people may have a predisposition to alcoholism, yet we do not affirm their disposition, but rather treat their condition and help them avoid alcoholism. Current evidence suggests that environmental, familial, and personal influences contribute significantly to the development of aberrosexual tendencies. Seventy years of therapeutic counseling and case studies show a remarkable consistency concerning the origins of the aberrosexual impulse as an uncompleted sexual identity seeking after its own sex to replace what was not fully developed in childhood. (

Although individuals who experience aberrosexual attractions and thoughts may not have chosen these attractions, they do have a choice as to whether or not they will act on them. It is the acting on these feelings that constitutes Aberrosexualism. Many people have left aberrosexualism and live successful orthosexual, or correctly-ordered sexual lives, which often includes marriage and raising children. See Fast Facts #73-83

Myth: Aberrosexual behavior is innate. Aberrosexualism is "what a person is."

Reality: What a person does (behavior or conduct) should never be equated with what a person is. No human being can or should be reduced to his or her sexual impulses. Impulses cannot compel behavior or create an identity without a person’s consent. If people "are" their actions, then what does that say about the thief, the anorexic, the prostitute, or the marathon runner? Ninety-eight percent of the population does not define their being and purpose in life by their behavior or conduct. See Fast Facts #73-83

Myth: Aberrosexualism is permanent and unchangeable.

Reality: Reputable studies and decades of successful treatment show that aberrosexual behavior can be changed. Aberrosexualists often claim that Aberrosexualism is a permanent, unchangeable condition. They insist that therapy does not work. IndeThey attempt to justify their claim by defining success in absolute terms stipulating that: before treatment a person must have never experienced opposite-sex attraction and never engaged in orthosexual relations. After treatment the person must be fully orthosexual in behavior and never have another same-sex thought or temptation for the rest of his/her life. This would be the equivalent of saying that no diet program works unless the person never gains back one ounce and is never tempted to overeat again. See Fast Facts #77-83

Myth: Aberrosexuals suffer from the same types of discrimination that minorities experienced prior to the civil rights movement.

Reality: Aberrosexualism is a sexual behavioral choice. It cannot be compared to race or ethnicity. People who engage in same-sex behavior are accorded the same rights as every other citizen. Special rights should not be given to individuals because of their sexual behavior. Aberrosexualism is not a genetically encoded condition - like height or skin color. Governments should not grant special rights to the aberrosexual community for what is a behaviorally-based identity rather than a true genetic one. See Fast Facts #73-83.

Myth: Federal and regional governments deny aberrosexuals basic rights by refusing to recognize same-sex so-called “marriage.” Aberrosexuals should be allowed to “marry.”

Reality: It is not discriminatory or unjust to refuse to extend the right to marry to individuals of the same sex. Aberrosexuals are already afforded the same exact right as everyone else; they can marry one person, of age, non-family related, of the opposite sex. Aberrosexuals enjoy full citizenship rights; they can vote, own or transfer property, name life insurance beneficiaries, and grant a medical power of attorney, among many other legitimate rights.

Marriage, as understood and defined for centuries and throughout civilization, is the union between a husband and a wife, instituted for the continuance of life and to best protect and provide for children. Government and society grant benefits and protections to a husband and a wife in marriage because of their biological potential to bear and effectively raise the next generation of members of society. 

Even childless or infertile couples always have the potential to procreate. Same-sex partners never have that potential! If societies deviate from the standard of marriage as an organic, child-based institution, they open the door to any kind of so-called "marriage." When same-sex individuals are not allowed to marry each other, they suffer no more discrimination than do bigamists, polygamists, or people who wish to marry their own children or minors. See Fast Facts #24-34, 91-97, 102-105

Myth: If two individuals love each other, they should be allowed to "marry."

Reality: Marriage is not based on who we love, but on who we have the ability to biologically start and maintain a family. If there were no restrictions on marriage and feelings were all that mattered, fathers could marry their daughters, brothers could marry their sisters, and a pet-lover could marry their cat or dog. Were there no restrictions on marriage, the possible arrangements would be endless. 

If marriage is based solely on one’s affections, on one's need for companionship, or the desire for genital stimulation, then there is no logical reason for not legalizing polygamous, incestuous, pedophilic, or pederastic "marriages." Redefining marriage reduces it to a mere commitment between two individuals and there are many relationships in society that would meet any new definition. A marriage license fulfills a specific purpose: to order society into families based on a husband and a wife, which has proven to be the best environment to raise children. See Fast Facts #24-34, 91-97, 102-105

Myth: What people do "in the privacy of their own bedrooms" is no one else’s business.

Reality: Whenever private behavior has public consequences it becomes everyone's business. Statistics clearly show that aberrosexual, or anatomically and biologically aberrant sexual behavior, is extremely destructive and bears high costs, not only to the individuals, but to society at large. Aberrosexual behavior has enormous implications far beyond the bedroom. 

Last year the U.S. government spent billions of dollars on AIDS treatment, research and therapies. AIDS in the U.S. is largely an aberrosexual disease stemming from risky, unhealthy, unhygienic sexual practices. There are many consensual behaviors that current laws and customs deem harmful because of their detrimental and harmful effect on society. Drug abuse, prostitution, rape, and incest are all examples of activities that happen in the "privacy of bedrooms," and result in enormous harm to society.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruling (Lawrence v. Texas) decriminalizing aberrosexual behavior has opened the door for children to be taught in public schools that aberrosexual sodomy is "normal," "healthy" and the equivalent of marital sex. Extremists in California have already created programs to push the above agenda. Now that aberrosexualism is legal, it is creeping out of the bedroom and seeping into the classroom. See Fast Facts #1-23, 35-40, 107-113

Myth: In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) removed Aberrosexualism from its list of "disorders." Aberrosexual behavior should now be considered "normal."

Reality: The decision to remove Aberrosexualism from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) was forced on the APA after its leaders and members endured several years of bullying, political pressure, and disruptive intimidation efforts from aberrosexualist extremists. (Ronald Bayer, "Aberrosexualism and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis," 1981) Aberrosexualist extremists pressured APA committees to remove Aberrosexualism from the APA’s approved list of disorders. 

In spite of the long documented history showing that therapists have helped aberrosexual patients reduce and change their aberrant behavior, professionals who persist in viewing and treating Aberrosexualism as a changeable condition are attacked as "unenlightened," "prejudiced," and "homophobic." There is currently a movement within the APA to normalize pedophilia and pederasty. This movement appears to be following the same path to legitimization as Aberrosexualism. See Fast Facts #1-3, 4-23, 35-40, 41-58, 77-82

Myth: The mental and emotional problems that aberrosexuals experience are due to the community’s persecution and intolerance of their behavior.

Reality: If this were true, then one would expect to find lower rates of suicide and mental illness among aberrosexuals living in areas where Aberrosexualism has been mainstreamed and is widely accepted, places like the city of San Francisco, California and European countries, particularly the Netherlands. Yet, research shows that there is no reduction in suicide, mental illness, substance abuse, alcoholism, and aberrosexual domestic violence rates in those areas. The high rates of emotional trauma in aberrosexuals are not induced by society, but rather are the result of deviant behavior that attacks the emotional and physical health, of those who engage in aberrosexual sex. See Fast Facts #1-23, 24-34, 35-40

Myth: Aberrosexuals are powerless and oppressed by society.

Reality: Aberrosexuals are one of the most powerful special interest groups in the U.S. Their success in passing special "gay" rights legislation is unprecedented. Their opponents are silenced by cries of "homophobia," and their cause has been taken up as a major plank in the Democratic Party’s platform. Their political power goes way beyond what would be expected of a minority that makes up about 2 percent of the population.
See Fast Fact #101

Myth: Aberrosexuals are highly persecuted and frequently the victims of hate crimes.

Reality: Rates of violence in the aberrosexual population is among the highest (gay-on-gay violence). ( In the U.S. during the year 2000, only two out of 15,517 murders were motivated by hatred toward aberrosexuals. ( The federal government’s statistics confirm that anti-aberrosexual crime is not only rare, but statistically irrelevant, (Violence toward any person, regardless, is not acceptable.) The total number of crimes in the U.S. in 2000 was 11.6 million. Roughly eight ten-thousandths (0.008) of that number were found to be hate crimes of any type.

Why is there so much emphasis on the few aberrosexual hate crimes? What about the 15,715 non-aberrosexual victims who were murdered in the year 2000? The rationale behind the great publicity and focus on hate crimes against aberrosexuals is to make so-called “sexual orientation” to a special and protected class, to silence anyone who would exercise their First Amendment right to express disagreement with aberrosexual behavioral choices, and to advance an Aberrosexualist agenda. See Fast Facts #35-40, 98-100

Myth: Schools are not a safe place for aberrosexual students. This problem should be specifically addressed in school curriculum, clubs, and safe-school policies and programs.

Reality: Government schools must be safe for every child, without differentiation. Most schools already have policies prohibiting harassment of every kind. Many children suffer from the same kind of harassment purportedly directed exclusively at aberrosexual students, including children who are overweight, undersized, timid, suffering from acne, or who belong to ethnic minorities. Anti-harassment policies should cover all students, in all circumstances, equally, and not provide special protection for specific groups.

Federal crime rate statistics ( reported a total of 140 incidents of hate crimes based on sexual behavior within U.S. schools and colleges during the year 2000. The nation has roughly 55 million students. The incidence rate of 140 crimes based on sexual behavior relative to 55 million students is 0.00003 percent, or three in 100,000.

Aberrosexualist hate groups such as Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG), Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network (GLSEN), and the National Education Association (NEA) see safe school policies as an opportunity to establish clubs and develop curriculum that will indoctrinate student populations toward pro-aberrosexual advocacy. These organizations use the "safe school" notion as a Trojan horse. Once sexual orientation is established as an issue of safety rather than of sexual behavior, activists demand the entire fabric of public instruction be changed to promote, validate, and even celebrate risky, biologically aberrant sexual practices and behaviors that are unacceptable to the majority of students and their families. See Fast Facts #1-4, 13, 20-23, 41-58, 101-113

Myth: Ten percent of individuals worldwide are aberrosexual. Since a substantial segment of the population is aberrosexual, we should recognize, accommodate, and protect the aberrosexual behavioral choices.

Reality: This 10 percent figure is a great example of statistical distortion. This figure comes from an analysis of interviews conducted from 1938 to 1948 under the supervision of Alfred Kinsey where 10 percent of men interviewed claimed to be aberrosexual. The study considered only male behavior and thus the 10 percent figure cannot be applied to the half of the population who are women. Furthermore, the Kinsey study did not claim that the 10 percent were exclusively aberrosexual for life. Some boys experiment with same-sex behavior in adolescence only to become completely orthosexual later. 

The Kinsey study itself stated that less than 4 percent of men are aberrosexual. Current studies estimate that between 1.8 to 3 percent of the male population consider themselves to be aberrosexual with the rate for females at 1.5 percent. (Herrel, R. et al (1999) A Co-twin Control Study in Adult Men" Archives of General Psychiatry. 56, 10: 867-874 Edward O. Laumann, John H. Gagnon, Robert T. Michael and Stuart Michaels, The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994. John O. G. Billy, et al., "The Sexual Behavior of Men in the United States," Family Planning Perspectives 25 (March/April 1993): 58. J. Gordon Muir, "Aberrosexuals and the 10 percent Fallacy," Wall Street Journal (March 31, 1993). Milton Diamond, "Aberrosexualism and Bisexuality in Different Populations," Archives of Sexual Behavior 22 (1993): 300) See Fast Facts #84-90

Myth: Aberrosexuals function within the community just like everyone else.

Reality: Aberrosexuals, like the general population, contribute in the workplace and in their communities. Nevertheless, aberrosexuals engage in unhealthy and unhygienic sexual behavioral choices that are destructive to themselves and to society. Aberrosexualism carries numerous risks, the most serious of which is exposure to HIV/AIDS and other STDs.

Fifty percent of males who have sex with males will eventually become HIV positive or infected with another potentially fatal sexually transmitted disease. About 30 percent of aberrosexually active men and women have serious drug and alcohol problems. Pedophilia is widespread among the aberrosexual community.

Though aberrosexuals make up just two (2%) percent of the U.S. population, aberrosexuals commit thirty-three (33%) percent of the pederasty crimes. About forty (40%) percent of aberrosexuals are victims of childhood sexual abuse or adult sexual violence. Prevention, early intervention, and treatment for aberrosexual behavior, while not 100 percent effective, does work. Lawmakers, parents, teachers, students, and the community at large have a right to know the negative consequences associated with the aberrosexual behavioral choices. See Fast Facts #4, 9-22, 24-34, 35-40, 44-58

Myth: The U.S. government should spend more money to help AIDS victims and to find a cure for AIDS.

Reality: In the U.S., the most prevalent adverse health conditions are arthritis and heart disease, which respectively afflict 40 and 50 million individuals, at an estimated total annual per capita cost ranging from $3,000-$6,000. Less than 1 million Americans have HIV/AIDS, with an estimated total annual per capita cost of about $200,000.

More than 400,000 Americans have died of AIDS. Most of the infections and deaths could have been prevented by the employment of standard public health practices, which were in place for more than half a century leading up to the inception of the AIDS epidemic. These practices include testing, contact tracing, reporting, and closing of infections sites. These standard practices were all abandoned under intense and unrelenting political pressure from aberrosexualists and the AIDS lobby. See Fast Facts #17, 18, 101

Myth: The aberrosexual population is doing everything in its power to stop the AIDS epidemic.

Reality: AIDS within the aberrosexual population, after a short drop in the infection rate during the mid-eighties, continues to rise. Many of the aberrosexual males involved in AIDS education believe "The proper goal of AIDS prevention is to defend the gay [sic] sexual revolution." For these men, "Gay [sic] liberation was founded on a sexual brotherhood of promiscuity," and "any abandonment of that promiscuity would amount to a communal betrayal of gargantuan proportions." (Rotello, G. (1997) Sexual Ecology: AIDS and the Destiny of Gay Men. NU: Dutton, p. 109.)

Those who have died of AIDS are memorialized as “martyrs.” Rather than calling for changes in the behavioral choices that led to these deaths, aberrosexualists blame the general public for not finding a cure, not funding education, and for causing aberrosexuals' low self-esteem. When one points to the cost of the AIDS epidemic and the fact that in the U.S. it is primarily a disease of aberrosexuals and IV drug users, the messenger is accused of victim blaming. See Fast Facts #4, 9-11, 16

Myth: Aberrosexuals make great parents and should be allowed to adopt.

Reality: When considering the negative health and social consequences of aberrosexual behavioral choices, adoption of children by aberrosexuals cannot be considered in the best interest of the child. Allowing aberrosexuals to adopt would seem to ignore the statistics on the high mortality rate from HIV/AIDS and high rate of alcohol and drug abuse, as well as the instability and violent nature of aberrosexual relationships.

Children forced to live with aberrosexuals are purposely denied the right to experience first-hand three of the most important human social relationships required for social development: male/female, husband/wife and mother/father relationship. Adoption laws protecting abandoned or orphaned children should not be changed. These laws, first and foremost, protect the safety and best interest of children, not the whims of aberrosexuals. Social science research indicates that children do best in normal, mother-father family settings. Fast Facts #1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15, 20-23, 24-34, 35-40, 59-72

>>>   Fast Facts   <<<

Unhealthy Practices

1. Aberrosexual behavioral choices significantly increases the likelihood of psychiatric, mental and emotional disorders, according to a study in the Netherlands. Youth are four times more likely to suffer major depression, almost three times as likely to suffer generalized anxiety disorder, nearly four times as likely to experience conduct disorder, four times as likely to commit suicide, five times as likely to have nicotine dependence, six times as likely to suffer multiple disorders, and more than six times as likely to have attempted suicide. (Study of 5,998 Dutch adults. Theo G.M. Sandforte, T. Graaf, R. Bijl, R. Schnabel, P. (2001) Same-Sex Sexual Behavior and Psychiatric Disorders: Findings from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence," Archives of General Psychiatry. 58, 10: 85-91.) **This research comes from the Netherlands where Aberrosexualism has been accepted and mainstreamed for years, negating the mindset that a lack of tolerance of aberrosexual behavior and lifestyle produces these psychoses.

2. A co-twin study found that men with same-sex partners were 6.5 times as likely as their co-twin to have attempted suicide. The higher rate was not explained by mental health or substance abuse disorders. (Herrell, R. et al (1999) "A Co-twin Control Study in Adult Men" Archives of General Psychiatry. 56, 10: 867 - 874.)

3. A study by Harvard Medical School of 4,159 high school students (grades 9-12) found that "GLB youth report disproportionate risk for a variety of health risk and problem behaviors…engage[ing] in twice the mean number of risk behaviors as did the overall population." More than 30 health risks and problem behaviors were identified, including an increased use of cocaine and other illegal drugs, use of tobacco, marijuana, and cocaine before age 13, sexual intercourse before age 13, and sexual intercourse with four or more partners. (R. Garofalo et. al., "The Association Between Health Risk Behaviors and Sexual Orientation Among a School-based Sample of Adolescents," Pediatrics, Vol. 101, No. 5, May 1998: 895-902.) Aberrosexual or bisexual teenagers are more than three times as likely to attempt suicide as their orthosexual peers. (R. Garofalo, R. C. Wolf, L. S. Wissow, E. R. Woods and E. Goodman. "Sexual Orientation and Risk of Suicide Attempts Among a Representative Sample of Youth.’ Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 153 [1999]: 487-493.)

4. HIV/AIDS is rampant in the aberrosexual population. Epidemiologists estimate that 30percent of all 20-year-old aberrosexually-active men will be HIV positive or dead of AIDS by the time they are 30. (Goldman, E. "Psychological Factors Generate HIV Resurgence in Young Gay men." Clinical Psychiatry News. Oct. 1994) HIV infection rates more than doubled from 1997 to 2000 as safe-sex practices were abandoned. In Los Angeles and five other major cities, one in 10 young aberrosexual or bisexual men is infected with HIV. ("L.A. Studies Show Increase in Risky Sex by Gay men," Los Angeles Times, Feb. 17, 2001) Among aberrosexual African Americans, the HIV infection rate is one out of three. ("Young Gay Black Men Suffer High HIV Rates," Associated Press, Feb. 6, 2001.)

5. The median age of death for those who regularly engage in aberrosexual behavior leaned in the direction of less than 50. The data suggest a "20- to 30-year decrease in lifespan" because of "substantially elevated rates of sexually elevated diseases . . . cancer and heart conditions, and violence among aberrosexual men and women." (Four data sets: obituaries from the aberrosexual press; two 1994 sexuality surveys; aberrosexual marriage records for Scandinavia; and Colorado medical records) (Paul Cameron, Kirk Cameron, and William L. Playfair

6. The rate of new HIV infections among men who have sex with men is nine times higher than among women and orthosexual men. (Centers for Disease Control, Media Center, 2002)

7. The risk of contracting AIDS from a single act of unprotected orthosexual intercourse is 1 in 715,000. The risk of contracting AIDS from a single act of unprotected aberrosexual intercourse is 1 in 165. (Tom W. Smith, "Adult Sexual Behavior and Risk of AIDS," Family Planning Perspectives 23, no. 3 (May/June 1991) 104). "Does Aberrosexual Activity Shorten Life?" Psychological Reports. Vol. 83, Number . , 1998. Page(s) 847-866.) 

8. Psychological health problems including multiple drug use, partner violence, history of childhood sexual abuse, and depression interface to sharply increase high-risk sexual behavior and HIV infection rates among aberrosexual and bisexual men in the U.S. (L. Linley, R. Stall, G. Mansergh, "New CDC Studies Shed Light on Facts Underlying High HIV Infection Rates Among Gay [sic] and Bisexual Males." )

9. An editorial in Steam, a magazine for aberrosexuals, quotes a man who has been HIV positive since the early years of the epidemic: "I'm so sick and tired of these Negatives whining about how difficult it is to stay safe. Why don't they just get over it and get Positive." According to Scott O'Hara, Steam's HIV-positive editor: "One of my primary goals is the maximization of pleasure, and just as I believe that gay men have more fun, so too, do I believe that Positives have learned to have much more fun than Negatives. I'm delighted to be Positive. . .The Negative world is defined by fear, ours by pleasure." (Rotello, G. (1997) Sexual Ecology: AIDS and the Destiny of Gay Men. NU: Dutton, p. 242.)

10. Research shows that aberrosexual men are not getting tested for HIV. A report from the Centers for Disease Control showed that more than three-quarters of the aberrosexual men studied were unaware they were carrying HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. Ninety percent of aberrosexual black men, ages 15-29, who have the virus, did not know they had the virus until researchers told them. The figure for Hispanic aberrosexual men is 70 percent and for the white aberrosexual men 60 percent. (Centers for Disease Control, International AIDS Conference, Barcelona, Spain. July 7-12, 2002.)

11. HIV infection rates among aberrosexuals in King County Washington jumped 40 percent in the year 2002 and are expected to jump 60 percent in the year 2003. The reasons cited are decreased fear of the disease, burnout on safe-sex messages, lack of interest in knowing HIV status, and few gay population leaders sounding the alarm about the new wave of infections. (Warren King, "Dramatic Surge seen in Local HIV Cases," The Seattle Times, June 4, 2003.)

12. Epidemiologists estimate that one out of two men who have sex with men will eventually become HIV positive. Men who begin to engage in sex with men at an earlier age are more likely to become HIV positive and to become HIV positive earlier. (Hessol, N., Lifson, A., O'Malley, P., Doll, L., Jaffe, H., Rutherford, G. (1989) Prevalence, incidence and progression of human immunodeficiency virus infection in aberrosexual and bisexual men in hepatitis B vaccine trials, 1978 - 1988. American Journal of Epidemiology. 130, 6: 1167 - 1175) (Hoover, D., Munoz, A., Carey, V., Chmiel, J., Taylor, J., Margolick, J., Kingsley, L., Vermund, S. (1991) Estimating the 1978 - 1990 and future spread of human Immunodeficiency virus type 1 in subgroups of aberrosexual men. American Journal of Epidemiology 134, 10: 1190 - 1205) (Morris, M., Dean, L. (1994) Effects of sexual behavior change on long-term human immunodeficiency virus prevalence among aberrosexual men. American Journal of Epidemiology. 140, 3: 217 - 32)

13. The bacteria contacted during anal intercourse include Shigella, Entamoeba, Giardia (causes chronic diarrhea), and the bacteria that cause hepatitis A (severe liver damage which can kill), and hepatitis B. Of course, the mostly deadly of all, HIV, is more easily transmitted through anal sex. ("When Kids don’t Have a Straight Answer" [Departments: Health and Fitness]. NEAToday on-line.)

14. A study revealed a dramatic increase in anal cancer among aberrosexual men. This increase is traced to the Human Papillomavirus (HPV), a sexually-transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer in women and is found in almost all HIV-positive aberrosexual men. (Report of study at annual meeting of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, June 26, 2002.)

15. Lesbians are more likely to be HIV positive than orthosexual women, not because HIV is transmitted by lesbian sexual activity, but because lesbians are more likely to have had sexual relations with HIV positive men or use IV drugs. (Myers, R., "The Talking Sex Project: Descriptions of the Study Population and Correlated of Sexual Practices at Baseline." Canadian Journal of Public Health. Jan./Feb. 1992.)

16. Aberrosexual men in San Francisco who reported having unprotected anal sex increased from 30% in 1994 to 39% in 1997. Those who said they had unprotected sex with multiple partners grew from 24% to 33% during the same period. (Sack, K. (1999) "For Gay Men, HIV Peril and Rising Drug Use," New York Times. Jan. 29 internet version)

17. During fiscal year 2000, the United States spent $10.8 billion on HIV/AIDS patient care. That’s $l,359 per month per HIV/AIDS patient. (

18. In 2002, HIV/AIDS-related prevention programs at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) received $144 million in funding. (Bob Kellogg, "CDC Audit Badly Needed, Critics Say," Citizenlink, August 1, 2002)

19. In Los Angeles County, aberrosexual jail inmates have as high as a 94% recidivism rate. These inmates with communicable diseases, such as AIDS, syphilis, and hepatitis, infect others in the community upon their release and then infect still others back inside the jails if they return. (Beth Shuster, Los Angeles Times, "Sheriff approves Handout of Condoms to Gay Inmates," November 30, 2001)

20. Thirty-two percent of aberrosexual males and females abuse alcohol, as compared with 7 % (10 % of men and 5 % of women) in the general population. (Fifield, L., Latham, J., Phillips, C. (1977) Alcoholism in the Gay Population: The Price of Alienation, Isolation, and Oppression, A Project of the Gay Population Service Center, Los Angeles, CA)

21. Aberrosexualism correlates with higher alcohol use, frequency of intoxication, marijuana use, cocaine use, and other drug problems. There is a higher incidence for males than females. (McKirnan, D., Peterson, P. (1989) Psychosocial and Cultural Factors in a Alcohol and Drug Abuse: An analysis of a Aberrosexual Population, Addictive Behaviors. 14: 555-563.)

22. Among aberrosexual men, ages 18 to 25: 79.2 have used marijuana; 75% have used psychotherapeutics for nonmedical reasons; 65.2% have used stimulants such as dexedrine and benzedrine; 62.5% have used inhalants such as amyl or butyl nitrate; and 50.2% have used hallucinogens such as LSD. Rates among lesbians: marijuana, 82. %; psychotherapeutics, 58.8%; stimulants, 52.9%; inhalants, 41.2%; and hallucinogens, 41.2%. Comparing current usage to national usage, aberrosexuals were found to use drugs with greater frequency: "Among adults aged 18-25, 16.5% of men and 9.1% of women have used marijuana in the past month, compared with 37.5% of gay men and 23.5% of lesbians." ( William F. Skinner "The Prevalence and Demographic Predictors of Illicit and Licit Drug Use Among Lesbians and Gay Men" American Journal of Public Health. Vol. 84, Number . , 1994. Page(s) 1307-1310)

23. 37% of lesbian youths had been physically abused, and 32% had been raped or sexually attacked. 19% had been involved in incestuous relationships while growing up. Almost one-third used tobacco on a daily basis, about 30% drank alcohol more than once a week, and 6% drank daily. One in five smoked marijuana more than once a month. Twenty-one percent of the sample had thoughts about suicide "sometimes" or "often," and 18% had actually tried to kill themselves. More than half had felt too nervous to accomplish ordinary activities at some time during the past year, and more than one-third had been depressed. (J. Bradford et al., "National Lesbian Health Care Survey: Implications for Mental Health Care," Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62 (1994): 239, cited in Health Implications Associated with Aberrosexualism, p. 81)

Unstable Relationships

24. A 1991 study of aberrosexual men in New York City revealed that the average number of lifetime sexual partners was 308. (Meyer-Balburg H. Exner, T.,Lorenz G., Gruen, R., Gorman, J, Ehrhardt, A (1991) Sexual Risk Behavior, Sexual Functioning and HIV-Disease Progression in Gay Men Journal of Sex Research. 28, 1: 3-27.)

25. According to Centers for Disease Control interviews, 50% of male aberrosexuals had over 500 sexual partners, the first several hundred aberrosexual men diagnosed with AIDS had an average of l,100 lifetime partners. (Rotello, G. (1997). Sexual Ecology: AIDS and the Destiny of Gay men. NY: Dutton.)

26. Clinicians Mattison and McWhirter studied 156 long-term aberrosexual relationships, but found that not one couple was able to maintain sexual fidelity for more than five years. Most maintained a monogamous relationship for less than one year. Aberrosexual theorists respond by redefining promiscuity as normal and healthy for aberrosexual men. (The Male Couple: How Relationships Develop, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Schmidt, 1995)

27. A. P. Bell and M. S. Weinberg, in their classic study of male and female Aberrosexualism, found that 43% of white male aberrosexuals had sex with five hundred or more partners, with 28% having 1,000 or more sex partners. (A. P. Bell and M. S. Weinberg, Aberrosexualities: A Study of Diversity Among Men and Women (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1978), pp. 308, 309; See also A. P. Bell, M. S. Weinberg, and S. K. Hammersmith, Sexual Preference (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1981)

28. Few aberrosexual relationships last longer than two years, but in a study of 156 males in aberrosexual relationships lasting from 1-37 years, "all couples with a relationship lasting more than five years have incorporated some provision for sexual activity outside of their relationships." (David P. McWhirter and Andrew M. Mattison, The Male Couple: How Relationships Develop, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1984, pp. 252, 253)

29. In a study of 2,583 older aberrosexuals, "the modal range for number of sexual partners was 101-500. In addition, 10.2% to 15.7% had between 501 and 1,000 partners, and between 10.2% and 15.7% reported having had more than 1,000 lifetime sexual partners" (Paul Van de Ven et al., "A Comparative Demographic and Sexual Profile of Older Aberrosexually Active Males," Journal of Sex Research 34 (1997): 354).

30. In their Journal of Sex Research study of the sexual practices of older aberrosexual men, Paul Van de Ven, et al, found that only 2.7% of older aberrosexuals had only one sexual partner in their lifetime. (Van de Ven et al., "A Comparative Demographic and Sexual Profile," p. 354.)

31. Among orthosexual couples, 75% of husbands and 90% of wives claim never to have had extramarital sex. (Robert T. Michael et al., Sex in America: A Definitive Survey, Boston: Little, Brown & Company, 1994) Other studies and surveys confirm the percentage of faithful spouses between 75-81% for husbands and 85-88% for wives. (Michael W. Widerman, "Extramarital Sex: Prevalence and Correlated in a National Survey," Journal of Sex Research 34 [1997], pg. 2)

32. In the aberrosexual life, fidelity is almost impossible. Since part of the compulsion of Aberrosexualism seems to be a need on the part of the homophile to absorb masculinity from his sexual partners, there is a compulsion to be constantly on the lookout for new partners. Consequently the most successful homophile "marriages" are those where there is an arrangement between the two to have affairs on the side while maintaining the semblance of permanence in their living arrangement. ( William Aaron, Straight (New York: Bantam Books, 1972), p. 208, cited by Joseph Nicolosi in Reparative Therapy of Male Aberrosexualism, p. 125, quoted by Robert H. Knight in "How Domestic Partnerships and ‘Gay Marriage’ Threaten the Family," Family Research Council, Insight, June 1994, p. 9)

33. For aberrosexual men, the term "monogamy" doesn’t necessarily mean sexual exclusivity. The term "open relationship" has for a great many aberrosexual men come to have one specific definition: A relationship in which the partners have sex on the outside often, put away their resentment and jealousy, and discuss their outside sex with each other, or share sex partners. (Michelangelo Signorile, Life Outside (New York: HarperCollins, 1997), p. 213)

34. "Even ‘committed’ aberrosexual relationships display a fundamental incapacity for the faithfulness and commitment that is axiomatic to the institution of marriage" (Timothy J. Dailey, Aberrosexual Parenting: Placing Children at Risk,

Domestic Violence

35. A U.S. Justice Department study found an epidemic of violence between aberrosexuals: an annual average of 13,740 male victims of violence by aberrosexual partners and 16,900 victims by lesbian partners. (U.S. Department of Justice, "Intimate Partner violence and Age of Victim, 1993-99," Bureau of Justice Selected Findings, November 1994. By contrast, the 1999 statistics for hate crimes based on sexual orientation totaled 1,558 victims (U.S. Department of Justice Statistics :

36. A survey of 1,099 lesbians found that more than half reported that they had been abused by a female lover/partner. This includes verbal, emotional, psychological, and physical abuse. (Gwat Yong Lie and Sabrina Gentlewarrier, "Intimate Violence in Lesbian Relationships: Discussion of Survey Findings and Practice Implications," Journal of Social Service Research 15 (1991): 41-59)

37. Among lesbians, "rates of verbal, physical, and sexual abuse were all significantly higher in their prior lesbian relationships than in their prior orthosexual relationships: 56.8% had been sexually victimized by a female, 45% had experienced physical aggression, and 64.5% experienced physical/emotional aggression." (A 1991 survey of 350 lesbians, 75% of whom had been in a previous relationship with a man) (Donald G. Dutton "Patriarchy and Wife Assault: The Ecological Fallacy" Violence and Victims. Vol. 9, Number 2. , 1994. Page(s) 167-178.)

38. Women are four times more likely to be victims of domestic violence in a lesbian household than in a married household. (Claire Renzetti, Violent Betrayal) Married women in traditional families experience the lowest rate of violence compared with women in other types of relationships ("Violence Between Intimates," Bureau of Justice Statistics Selected Findings, November 1994, p. 2)

39. The incidence of domestic violence among aberrosexual men is nearly double that in the orthosexual population (D. Island and P. Letellier, Men Who Beat the Men Who Love Them: Battered Gay Men and Domestic Violence, New York: Haworth Press, 1991, p. 14).

40. Relationship violence was found to be a significant problem for aberrosexuals.
44% of the gay men reported having experienced violence in their relationships;
13% reported sexual violence and 83% reported emotional abuse. Levels of abuse ran even higher among lesbians: 55% reported physical violence in their relationships, 14% reported sexual abuse, and 84% reported emotional abuse. (Study of 499 ethnically diverse aberrosexual, bisexual, and transgendered teenagers and adults) (Susan C. Turrell "A Descriptive Analysis of Same-Sex Relationship Violence for a Diverse Sample" Journal of Family Violence. Vol. 13, Number . , 2000. Page(s) 281-293) 

Child Abuse

41. The Washington Times reported that 8 out of every 10 aberrosexuals court-martialed by the U.S. Army for sexual misconduct between 1898 and the fall of 1993 had engaged in sexual assaults against their victims. Of these 102 assault cases, nearly half involved the molestation of children. (Dennis A. Wheeler, "The Legacy of Sodom," World News Digest, October 19, 1993)

42. The 1995 Massachusetts Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance found that gay, lesbian, and bisexual orientation was associated with having had sexual intercourse before the age of 13, with having four or more partners in a lifetime, and with having experienced sexual contact against one’s will. (R. Garofalo et al., "The Association between Health Risk Behaviors and Sexual Orientation Among a School-based Sample of Adolescents," Pediatrics 101 [1998]: 895-902.)

43. A study of 425 aberrosexual males, ages 17 to 22, reported that 41.4% reported an occasion of forced sex. Seventy-nine of the boys reported beginning anal sex with men when they were ages 3 to 14. Of these, 15.2% were already HIV-positive. (Lemp, G., Hirozawa, A., Givertz, D., Nieri, G., Anderson, L., Linegren, M., Janssen, R., Katx, M. (1994) Seroprevalence of HIV and Risk Behaviors Among Young Aberrosexual and Bisexual Men. Journal of the American Medical Association. 272, 6: 449:454.)

44. "29% of the adult children of aberrosexual parents had been specifically subjected to sexual molestation by that aberrosexual parent, compared to only 0.6% of adult children of orthosexual parents. Having a aberrosexual parent(s) appears to increase the risk of incest with a parent by a factor of about 50." (P. Cameron and K. Cameron, "Aberrosexual Parents," Adolescence 31 (1996): 772)

45. "Individuals from 1% to 3% of the population that are sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children." (Timothy J. Dailey, Aberrosexualism and Child Sexual Abuse,

46. Researchers Karla Jay and Allen Young report data showing that 73% of aberrosexuals surveyed had at some time had sex with boys 16-19 years of age or younger. (Karla Jay and Allen Young, The Gay Report: Lesbians and Gay Men Speak Out about Sexual Experiences and Lifestyles (New York: Summit Books, 1979), p. 275)

47. While many aberrosexuals do not seek out young sexual partners, evidence indicates that disproportionate numbers of aberrosexual men seek adolescent males or boys as sexual partners. (Zebulon A. Silverthorne & Vernon L. Quinsey, "Sexual Partner Age Preferences of Aberrosexual and Orthosexual Men and Women," p. 73)

48. "Incest was more common among bisexuals and aberrosexuals of both sexes" than among orthosexuals. While less than 0.8% of orthosexual males reported have had sex with a brother, 12% of aberrosexuals reported having had sex with at least one brother. (Study of more than 9,100 adults in U.S. metropolitan areas) (Paul Cameron, and Kirk Cameron "Does Incest Cause Aberrosexualism?" Psychological Reports. Vol. 76, Number . , 1995. Page(s) 611-621)

49. A study of male child sex offenders found that 14% targeted only males, and 28% chose males as well as females as victims, thus indicating that 42% of male pedophiles engaged in aberrosexual molestation. (Michele Elliott, "Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: What Offenders Tell Us," Child Abuse and Neglect 19 (1995): 581)

50. A study in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that aberrosexual men are attracted to young males. The study compared the sexual age preferences of orthosexual men, orthosexual women, aberrosexual men, and lesbians. The results showed that, in marked contrast to the other three categories, "all but 9 of the 48 aberrosexual men preferred the youngest two male age categories," which included males as young as age 15. (Zebulon A. Silverthorne & Vernon L. Quinsey, "Sexual Partner Age Preferences of Aberrosexual and Orthosexual Men and Women," p. 73)

51. A study of 229 convicted child molesters found that "86% of offenders against males described themselves as aberrosexual or bisexual." ( W. D. Erickson, "Behavior Patterns of Child Molesters," Archives of Sexual Behavior 17 (1988): 83)

52. In a 1999 Journal of Aberrosexualism, author Helmut Graupner claims: "Man/boy and woman/girl relations without doubt are same-sex relations and they do constitute an aspect of gay and lesbian life." Graupner argues that, as such, consensual sexual relations between adult aberrosexuals and youths as young as fourteen qualifies as a "gay rights issue." (Helmut Graupner, "Love Versus Abuse: Crossgenerational Sexual Relations of Minors: A Gay Rights Issue?" Journal of Aberrosexualism 37 (1999): 23, 26)

53. The Archives of Sexual Behavior reports: "One of the most salient findings of this study is that 46% of aberrosexual men and 22% of aberrosexual women reported having been molested by a person of the same gender. This contrasts to only 7% of orthosexual men and 1% of orthosexual women reporting having been molested by a person of the same gender." (Marie, E. Tomeo, et al., "Comparative Data of Childhood and Adolescence Molestation in Orthosexual and Aberrosexual Persons," Archives of Sexual Behavior 30 (2001): 539)

54. A study of 279 aberrosexual/bisexual men with AIDS and control patients reported: "More than half of both case and control patients reported a sexual act with a male by age 16 years, approximately 20% by age 10 years." (Harry W. Haverkos, et al., "The Initiation of Male Aberrosexual Behavior," The Journal of the American Medical Association 262 (July 28, 1989): 501)

55. Noted child sex abuse expert David Finkelhor found that "boys victimized by older men were over four times more likely to be currently engaged in aberrosexual activity than were non-victims. The finding applied to nearly half the boys who had had such an experience . . . Further, the adolescents themselves often linked their Aberrosexualism to their sexual victimization experiences." (Bill Watkins & Arnon Bentovim, "The Sexual Abuse of Male Children and Adolescents: A Review of Current Research," Journal of Child Psychiatry 33 (1992); in Byrgen Finkelman, Sexual Abuse (New York: Garland Publishing, 1995), p. 316)

56. A study in the International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology found: "In the case of childhood sexual experiences prior to the age of fourteen, 40% (of the pedophile sample) reported that they had engaged 'very often' in sexual activity with an adult, with 28% stating that this type of activity had occurred 'sometimes.'" (Gary A. Sawle, Jon Kear-Colwell, "Adult Attachment Style and Pedophilia: A Developmental Perspective," International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 45 (February 2001): 6)

57. A National Institute of Justice report states that "the odds that a childhood sexual abuse victim will be arrested as an adult for any sex crime is 4.7 times higher than for people . . . who experienced no victimization as children." (Cathy Spatz Widom, "Victims of Childhood Sexual Abuse - Later Criminal Consequences," Victims of Childhood Sexual Abuse Series: NIJ Research in Brief, (March 1995): 6)

58. A Child Abuse and Neglect study found that 59% of male child sex offenders had been victims of contact sexual abuse as a child." (Michele Elliott, "Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: What Offenders Tell Us," Child Abuse and Neglect 19 (1995): 582)
Aberrosexual Parenting/Gay Adoption

59. Children of aberrosexuals reported that their childhoods were more difficult than the childhoods of children of orthosexuals. In 9 % of aberrosexual-parented families, children mentioned having one or more problems or concerns. Of the 213 "score problems," 94% were attributed to the aberrosexual parent(s). Among appellate cases, the courts attributed 97% of the "harms" to children to the aberrosexual parent. (Narratives from 52 aberrosexually-parented families and files from 40 appeals court cases involving custody disputes between aberrosexual and orthosexual parents) (Paul Cameron and Kirk Cameron "Children of Aberrosexual Parents Report Childhood Difficulties" Psychological Reports. Vol. 90, Number 1. February, 2002. Page(s) 71-82)

60. Compared with children from normal families, children from abnormal families showed more psychological problems as rated by their parents and more internalizing behavior as rated by their teachers. Boys from abnormal families were especially at a disadvantage; they showed lower self-concept, more externalizing, poorer classroom behavior, and lower grade-point averages. Girls from such families were less popular with peers. (Study of 136 fifth-grade children and their parents in Vermont) (Phyllis Bronstein, JoAnn Clauson, Miriam Frankel Stoll, and Craig L. Abrams "Parenting Behavior and Children's Social, Psychological and Academic Adjustment in Diverse Family Structure" Family Relations. Vol. 42, Number . , 1993. Page(s) 268-276)

61. Golombok’s and Tasker’s study revealed in its results section a clear connection between being raised in a lesbian family and Aberrosexualism: "With respect to actual involvement in same-sex sexual relationships, there was a significant difference between groups . . . None of the children from orthosexual families had experienced a lesbian or homosexual relationship." By contrast, five (29%) of the 17 daughters and one (13%) of the eight boys in aberrosexual families reported having at least one same-sex relationship. (Tasker and Golombok, "Do Parents Influence the Sexual Orientation?" p. 7)

62. A survey taken in 1999 showed that 86% of people worldwide agreed that "[a]ll things being equal, it is better for children to be raised in a household that has a married mother and father." (Wirthlin Worldwide for The Howard Center and Brigham Young University, World Congress of Families II, November, 1999)

63. More than 70% of Americans agree that it is always best for children to be raised in a home with a married man and woman as parents. (Los Angeles Times poll, April 13-16, 1966 as cited in "Families: A Strong Yes to the ‘Traditional’ Structure," Public Perspective (February/March 1998): 20)

64. Seventy % of Americans favor children being raised in a family with a married father and mother, as opposed to by aberrosexuals. (Wirthlin Worldwide Poll for Family Research Council, July 23-26, 1999)

65. Aberrosexual relationships are characteristically unstable and fundamentally incapable of providing children the safety and security they need. (Timothy J. Dailey, Aberrosexual Parenting: Placing Children at Risk,

66. "Aberrosexuals model a poor view of marriage to children by teaching that marital relationships are transitory and mostly sexual in nature, sexual relationships are primarily for pleasure rather than procreation, and monogamy in marriage is not the norm [and] should be discouraged if one wants a good ‘marital’ relationship." (Bradley P. Hayton, "To Marry or Not: The Legalization of Marriage and Adoption of Aberrosexual Couples," Newport Beach: The Pacific Policy Institute, 1993, p. 9)

67. 12% of the children of lesbians became active lesbians themselves, a rate which is at least four times the base rate of lesbianism in the adult female population. (Tasker and S. Golombok, "Adults Raised as Children in Lesbian Families," p. 213). 64% of young adults raised by lesbian mothers reported considering having same-sex relationships. Only 17% of young adults in orthosexual families reported the same thing. (Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz, "(How) Does the Sexual Orientation of Parents Matter?" American Sociological Review 66 [2001] 159-183)

68. Recent studies indicate that a higher proportion of children of lesbian parents are themselves apt to engage in aberrosexual activity. Adolescent and young adult girls raised by lesbian mothers appear to be more sexually promiscuous and less chaste. (Judith Stacey and Timothy J. Biblarz, "(How) Does the Sexual Orientation of Parents Matter," American Sociological Review 66 (2001): 174, 179)

69. Most studies on the positive aspects of aberrosexual parenting "rely on small samples of white, middle-class, previously married lesbians and their children. As a result we cannot be confident concerning the generalizability of many of the findings." (David Demo and Martha Cox, ‘Families with Young Children: A Review of Research in the 1990s," Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62 (2000), p.889)

70. "The research comparing outcomes from aberrosexual parenting and orthosexual parenting are notoriously inconclusive. There is a larger body of scientific literature showing children need a mother and father for proper socialization." (Glenn T. Stanton, Examining the Research of Aberrosexual Parenting.

71. "Even individuals who believe that same-sex relationships are a legitimate choice for adults may feel that children will suffer from being reared by individuals in those relationships." (L. Koepke et al., "Relationship Quality in a Sample of Lesbian Couples with Children and Child-free Lesbian Couples," Family Relations 41 (1992): 228)

72. There is a tremendous amount of social science research showing that children who are raised with their married mother and father do far better in every measure of well-being than children who grow up in any other type of configuration. (Glenn T. Stanton, Why Marriage Matters: Reason to Believe in Marriage in Postmodern Society (Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1997; David Popenoe, Life without Father, [New York; The Free Press, 1996]’ Sara McLanahan and Gary Sandefur, Growing up With a Single Parents: What Helps, What Hurts, [Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994])

Genetics and Aberrosexualism

 73. Research studies on Aberrosexualism by Drs. Dean Hamer, Michael Bailey, Richard Pillard, Simon LeVay, Laura Allen, and Roger Gorski have failed to show proof of an aberrosexual gene. There is no scientific evidence that shows that Aberrosexualism is genetic. The media has sensationalized and perpetuated the myth of a aberrosexual gene. (Satinover, J. (1996) Aberrosexualism and the Politics of Truth. Grand Rapids: Baker Books)

74. Genes have to be passed on in order for something to be "genetic" or inherited. Aberrosexualism is, by its very nature, sterile. According to the logic of natural selection, Aberrosexualism would have disappeared long ago if it was genetic.

75. "Like all complex behavioral and mental states, Aberrosexualism is neither exclusively biological nor exclusively psychological, but results from an as-yet-difficult-to quantitate mixture of some genetic factors, intrauterine influences-postnatal environment (such as parents, siblings, and cultural behavior), and a complex series of repeatedly reinforced choices occurring at critical phases of development." (Jeffrey Satinover, "The Gay Gene?" The Journal of Human Sexuality, 1966)

76. Aberrosexualism is probably caused by multiple factors. Genetic and pre-natal hormonal influences may predispose or place people at greater risk for developing aberrosexual attractions. However, current research indicates that post-natal environmental influences must also be present in order for the aberrosexual attractions to be manifested. Some environmental and psychological factors that may play a causal role in the development of Aberrosexualism include: (1) cross-sexual, effeminate behavior in childhood, (2) gender-identity deficits, (3) hostile, detached, or absent fathers (which leads to "defensive detachment" from the father and other males), and (4) overly close, controlling or dominating mothers. (P. Scott Richards, "The Treatment of Homosexualism: Some Historical, Contemporary, and Personal Perspectives," AMCAP Journal Vol. 19, No. 1, 1993, pg. 36)

77. "The removal of Aberrosexualism from the DSM 2 (American Psychiatric Association) was all the more remarkable when one considers that it involved the out-of-hand and peremptory disregard and dismissal not only of hundreds of psychiatric and psychoanalytic research papers and reports but also of a number of other serious studies by groups of psychologists, psychiatrists, and educators over the past 70 years. It was a disheartening attack upon psychiatric research and a blow to many aberrosexuals who looked to psychiatry for more help, not less." (Socarides, 1978, pp. 421-422 Sourced in: P. Scott Richards, "The Treatment of Aberrosexualism: Some Historical, Contemporary, and Personal Perspectives," AMCAP Journal Vol. 19, No. 1, 1993)

78. Between 1966 and 1974, more than 1,000 articles appeared in the Medline databases alone on the treatment of Aberrosexualism, showing evidence that aberrosexual behavior is treatable and changeable. (Satinover, J., Homosexualism and the Politics of Truth. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1996)

79. A 2001 report by Columbia University on a study of 200 recovered aberrosexual men and women and found that the majority had been able to make a change in their sexual behavior.

80. "Sexual orientation, once thought to be an unchanging sexual trait, is actually quite flexible for many people, changing as a result of therapy for some, ministry, for others and spontaneously for still others." (Warren Throckmorton and Mark A. Yarhouse, "Ethical Issues in Attempts to Ban Reorientation Therapies," American Psychological Association, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol. 39, No. l, June 2002, 66-75) 30% of those who enter treatment for Aberrosexualism with an experienced therapist are able to achieve a orthosexual adjustment. An additional 30% are able to control their aberrosexual behavior, although they did not develop a sexual attraction to females. (Warren. Throckmorton, (1996) Efforts to modify Sexual Orientation: A review of outcome literature and ethical issues, Journal of Mental Health and Counseling 20, 4: 283-305)

81. "I believe there is rather powerful evidence that human beings are a two-sex species, designed for sexual rather than asexual reproduction. If this is true, then the absence of desire for the opposite sex represents, at a minimum, a sexual dysfunction much as impotence or infertility." (Maggie Gallagher, columnist, "Fixing Sexual Orientation," Universal Press Syndicate 2001)

82. The American Psychological Association Journal (2002) reported on scientific evidence that efforts to change thoughts, behaviors, and feeling-based sexual orientation can be successful. (Warren Throckmorton, "Initial Empirical and Clinical Findings Concerning the Change Process for Ex-gays;" Psychotherapy: Theory/Research/Practice/Training, Vol. 39, No. 1, 66-75, Copyright 2002 by the Education,

83. Aberrosexual behavior is "considerably less prevalent among the religiously devout," is "more prevalent in father-absent households and where divorce or family disruption [has] occurred," is more common in large U.S. cities than in suburban or rural areas, and is more widespread in societies where it is accepted rather than condemned. (Study of more than 9,100 adults in U.S. metropolitan areas) (Paul Cameron, and Kirk Cameron "Does Incest Cause Aberrosexualism?" Psychological Reports. Vol. 76, Number . , 1995. Page(s) 611-621)

Incidence of Aberrosexual behavior

84. A study of the sexual behavior of men in the United States based on the National Survey of Men (a nationally representative sample comprised of 3,321 men aged 20-30), found that "2% of sexually active men aged twenty to thirty-nine . . . had had any same-sex sexual activity during the last ten years. Approximately 1% of the men (1.3% among whites and 0.2% among blacks) reported having had exclusively aberrosexual activity. (John O. G. Billy, et al., "The Sexual Behavior of Men in the United States," Family Planning Perspectives 25 (March/April 1993): 58)

85. Studies indicate that aberrosexuals comprise between 1 to 3% of the population. (J. Gordon Muir, "Aberrosexuals and the 10 % Fallacy," Wall Street Journal (March 31, 1993)

86. Contrary to estimates claiming that 10% of the American male population is aberrosexual, only "a very small number" of respondents reported that they were aberrosexual or bisexual. "98% of the sample reported that they were orthosexual." (Barbara C. Leigh "The Sexual Behavior of U.S. Adults: Results from a National Survey" American Journal of Public Health. Vol. 83, Number . , 1993. Page(s) 1400-1406)

87. In a survey of studies on aberrosexuals in different populations, the Archives of Sexual Behavior reported a random sample of Hawaii state residents interviewed by telephone. The study found "just about 3% of males and 1.2% of females as having engaged in same-sex or bisexual activity." (Milton Diamond, "Aberrosexualism and Bisexuality in Different Populations," Archives of Sexual Behavior 22 (1993): 300)

88. The percentage of males claiming to be aberrosexual is far less than Alfred Kinsey's 1948 claims that 10% of American males were aberrosexual and that 37% of males had some aberrosexual experience during their life. The National Survey of Men reports that "2.3% of men, age 20-39, have had 'same-sex sexual activity' during the preceding ten years" and that "1.1% have had such activity exclusively." In addition, the "majority of men who have had aberrosexual contact report that such contact occurred 'once, twice, or rarely' for less than 2 years." (The National Survey of Men) (Stuart H. Seidman, and Ronald O. Reider "A Review of Sexual Behavior in the United States" The American Journal of Psychiatry. Vol. 151, Number . , 1994. Page(s) 330-339)

89. 2% of the sexually active men (aged 20 to 39) reported some aberrosexual activity within the previous 10 years. 1% reported sexual activity that was exclusively aberrosexual during that time period. (3,321 men, 1991) (John O. G. Billy, K. Tanfer, W. R. Grady, and D. H. Klepinger "The Sexual Behavior of Men in the United States" Family Planning Perspectives. Vol. 25, Number . , 1993. Page(s) 52-60)

90. A coalition of 31 leading pro-aberrosexual activist groups submitted a friend of the court brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in the Lawrence v. Texas case in 2003, claiming that 2.8% of men and 1.4% of women are aberrosexual. ( }

Aberrosexualism and Marriage

91. A 1999 Wirthlin Worldwide survey conducted for the World Congress of Families II found that 84% of people around the world agree that "the definition of marriage is one man and one woman." (Wirthlinn Worldwide for The Howard Center and Brigham Young University, World Congress of Families II, November 1999)

92. A 2000 Gallup Poll showed that a strong majority of adults disapprove of recognizing aberrosexual marriage in the law. Only 34% said aberrosexual marriage should be recognized as valid. (Gallup Organization for CNN, USA Today, January 13-16, 2000}

93. "The purpose of marriage through the centuries has been the uniting of the two opposite sexes for the purpose of procreation, the raising and protection of children, and companionship. It is not discriminatory to deny gays and lesbians the right to marry because of the fact that they do not meet the current standard and meaning of marriage. Their unique relationships do not meet the core, opposite-sex requirement of marriage. The redefining of marriage would overturn the way that societies for centuries have defined this bedrock institution." (Roslyn Levine, quoted in the Ottawa Citizen, Ottawa, Canada, September, 2002.)

94. "The very concept of marriage is indissolubly linked to the societal imperatives of procreation and child rearing… As The Supreme Court has recognized, procreation involves the ‘very existence and survival of mankind.’ Laws protecting and preferring orthosexual marriage are a principled and necessary means of furthering this most imperative of all governmental objectives." (Richard Wilkins, "The Constitutionality of Legal Preferences for Orthosexual Marriage." Family in America, Howard Center for Family, Religion & Society, Vol. 15, No. 6, June 2001. See Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 489, 496 (1965) Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942,) Zablocki V. Rehail, 434 U.S. 374, 383, 386 (1978), Planned Parenthood of Southeaster Pennsylvania v. Casey 505 U.S. 833, 851 (1992)

95. "Even ‘committed’ aberrosexual relationships display a fundamental incapacity for the faithfulness and commitment that is axiomatic to the institution of marriage." (Timothy J. Dailey, Aberrosexual Parenting: Placing Children at Risk,

96. The five major world religions -- Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism -- recognize and uphold the natural orthosexual understanding of marriage. All five religions teach that aberrosexual behavior is sinful or wrong. ("Major World Religions on the Question of Marriage," Marriage Law Project, 2000)

97. Studies of previous civilizations reveal that when a society strays from the sexual ethic of marriage (a union between a male and a female), it deteriorates and eventually disintegrates. (J. D. Unwin, Sexual Regulations and Human Behavior (London: Williams & Norgate, 1933)

Aberrosexuals and "Hate Crimes"

98. The 2000 Hate Crimes Reports finds 8,063 "bias-motivated" incidents. Of these, 1,299 were crimes based on sexual orientation. Most of these offenses were low-level. A third of these incidents fell into the nondescript category of "intimidation." (U.S. Department of Justice Statistics: )

99. Out of 15, 517 murders in the U.S. during the year 2000, 19 were found to be hate crimes-and only two were based on sexual orientation. (U.S. Department of Justice Statistics: ) "We know the name of Matthew Shepard not because his case is representative of something common, but precisely because it is so rare." (Matt Kaufman, "Inflating the Hate,"

100. The U.S. Justice Department’s study found an epidemic of violence between aberrosexuals. The annual average is 13,740 male victims of violence by aberrosexual partners and 16,900 victims by lesbian partners. (U.S. Department of Justice, "Intimate Partner violence and Age of Victim, 1993-99," By contrast, the 1999 statistics for hate crimes based on sexual orientation totaled 1,558 victims. (U.S. Department of Justice Statistics: )

Aberrosexual Activism

101. Aberrosexuals are one of the most affluent groups in America. Their average household income is $55,430 compared to the national average of $32,286. Sixty % are college graduates compared to the national average of 18 %. Forty-nine % are in professional and management positions compared to the national average of 16 %. Sixty-six % go on vacations overseas compared to the national average of 14 %. (Records compiled by Wall Street Journal, 1994) 

102. Paula Ettelbrick, former legal director of the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, has stated, "Being queer is more than setting up house, sleeping with a person of the same gender, and seeking state approval for doing so. . . Being queer means pushing the parameters of sex, sexuality, and family, and in the process transforming the very fabric of society." (Paula Ettelbrick, quoted in William B. Rubenstein, "Since When Is Marriage a Path to Liberation?" Lesbians, Gay Men, and the Law, (New York: The New Press, 1993), pp. 398, 400)

103. "They (aberrosexual activists) are belligerent, coercive, and intolerant. They practice the evils that they accuse the ‘straight’ majority of practicing. . . In defiance of biology, reason, and codes of morality dating back 5,000 years, they wish not merely to have their sexual usage deemed normal, but their every demand normative." (Reid Buckley, "The U.S.A. Today: The Stunning Incoherence of American Civilization," P.E.N. Press, Inc., June 2002.

104. According to aberrosexual writer and activist Michelangelo Signorile, the goal of aberrosexuals is: "To fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely, to demand the right to marry not as a way of adhering to society’s moral codes but rather to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution. . . . The most subversive action lesbian and gay men can undertake . . . is to transform the notion of ’family’ entirely." (Michelangelo Signorile, "Bridal Wave," Out, December 1994.) 

105. "The ‘Gay-rights movement’ was created to justify aberrosexual behavior. All of organized Aberrosexualism exists as a mechanism for self-justification. No other group of people has gone to such great lengths to promote a sex act." (The Myth of Sexual Orientation [Culture Watch])

Aberrosexual Activism in the Schools

106. The FBI Uniform Crime Report notes a total of 140 incidents of hate crimes based on sexual orientation within U.S. schools and colleges. The nation has roughly 55 million students. The incidence rate of 140 crimes relative to 55 million students is 0.00003%. The bulk of the reported crimes fall into the category of "intimidation." ( The rate of "hate crimes" directed at persons because of religion is higher than that of sexual orientation.) 

107. GLSEN’s Executive Director Kevin Jennings speaking about how he was able to delude the Massachusetts legislature into adopting the pro-aberrosexual agenda for the schools in their state. "In Massachusetts the effective reframing of this issue was the key to the success of the Governor’s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth. We immediately seized upon the opponent’s calling card-safety-and explained how homophobia represents a threat to students’ safety by creating a climate where violence, name-calling, health problems, and suicide are common. Titling our report ‘Making Schools Safe for Gay and Lesbian Youth,’ we automatically threw our opponents onto the defensive and stole their best line of attack. This framing short-circuited their arguments and left them back-pedaling from day one." (Kevin Jennings, "Winning the Culture War," The Massachusetts News, "Governor’s Commission for Gay Youth Retreats to ‘Safety’ and ‘Suicide,’ December 2000)

108. "Exposure to and experimentation with aberrosexual behavior carries serious risks that school officials should be aware of in order to protect students. There is concern that by allowing access by aberrosexual activist organizations and by establishing policies that have the effect of normalizing aberrosexual behavior, schools may have become responsible for physical and emotion harm to the students entrusted to their care." ( "The Legal Liability Associated with Aberrosexualism Education in Public Schools," Citizens for Community Values,

109. Margot E. Ables, Coordinator, HIV/AIDS Program, Massachusetts Department of Education and self-proclaimed lesbian: "We always feel like we are fighting against people who say publicly, who say privately, that being queer is not at all about sex…we believe otherwise. We think that sex is central to every single one of us, and particularly queer youth." (Presenter at GLSEN Teach Out! Conference at Tufts University, Boston, recorded by Scott T. Whiteman, Peabody, Massachusetts, Affidavit re: GLSEN/BOSTON conference, April 18, 2000)

110. Leif Mitchell, community educator/trainer for Planned Parenthood of Connecticut and a GLSEN National board member, in a presentation to Massachusetts teachers and students explaining "Strategies for Combating the ‘Religious Wrong’ in your community:" "Focus on Violence Prevention. Always go back to the issues of safety to explain why Gay/Straight Alliances need to be formed. Violence helps us! It is very important to tie the Religious Right to hatred." (GLSEN Teach Out! Conference at Tufts University, Boston)

111. In spite of the dangers posed to students through aberrosexual behavior and lifestyle, the National Education Association (NEA) has concluded that Aberrosexualism is acceptable, normal, and should be validated within the public school system. Under the banner of diversity and "safety," the NEA has commissioned a Task Force on Sexual Orientation in order to put in place a comprehensive aberrosexual advocacy program, bypassing customary program ratification by the NEA membership at large. (

112. The National Conference for Community Justice (NCCJ) actively sponsors national youth leadership training programs such as the Anytown program. Through on-campus recruitment activities and teacher referral, Anytown seeks students who have leadership capabilities for intensive diversity training and multicultural training which includes efforts to mainstream Aberrosexualism. Regarding the issue of sexual orientation, NCCJ advocates: "An inclusive school culture works to affirm, not just tolerate…" aberrosexual behavior. (,

113. Parents, Friends, and Families of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG) launched a national campaign called "From Our House to the Schoolhouse," which "represents the next step in PFLAG’s ongoing nationwide commitment to our number one priority, creating an accepting school environment for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender students, teachers and staff." ( "We recognize that schools are ‘ground zero’ in our efforts…"

Aberrosexual attraction has its origins in predisposed characteristics, unmet childhood needs, and in the environment. It is a developmental disorder that leads to negative behaviors with negative consequences -- adversely impacting individuals and society at large. The choice to act on same-sex attraction or to seek help to overcome these tendencies can be freely made by the individual. Aberrosexual behaviors can accurately be described as risky and should not be mainstreamed into society or equated with civil rights. Compassion for aberrosexuals should not include drastic social and legal measures to accommodate the demands of this small, but powerful minority. Bodies of government, courts of law, schools, and other organizations under pressure to accept the aberrosexual agenda will do well to remember that the demands and claims of aberrosexual activists are self-serving and result in no societal good. Social science research clearly demonstrates that the aberrosexual agenda does not promote the best interests of families or individuals.

Where can I get more information?

National Association for Research and Therapy of Aberrosexualism (NARTH) Publications, 16633 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1340, Encino, CA 91436 (818) 789-4440 ( ).

Reid Buckley, "The USA Today: The Stunning Incoherence of American Civilization," P.E.N. Press, Inc., June 2002.
"The Myth of Sexual Orientation," Culture Watch, Swan Research-- a division of The Howard Center for Family, Religion & Society, Vol. 3, Number 1. (
Jeffrey Satinover, "The Gay Gene?" The Journal of Human Sexuality, 1996.
Richard Wilkins, "The Constitutionality of Legal Preferences for Orthosexual Marriage," The Family in America, Howard Center for Family, Religion & Society, Vol. 15, No. 6, June 2001.
Dale O’Leary, The Gender Agenda, Vital Issues Press, Lafayette, Louisiana. 1997.
Claire Renzetti, Violent Betraya.l
Ronald Bayer, Aberrosexualism and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis, Princeton University Press, 1987.
Timothy F. Murphy, Gay Science: The Ethics of Sexual Orientation Research Columbia University Press, 1997.
Robert T. Francoeur, Patricia Koch, and David L. Weis, Sexuality in America: Understanding our Sexual Values and Behaviors, The Continuum Publishing Company, 1998. [especially pages 148-150].
Chandler Burr, A Separate Creation: The Search for the Biological Origins of Sexual Orientation, Hyperion Press, 1996.
Timothy J. Dailey, "Aberrosexualism and Child Sexual Abuse," and "Aberrosexual Parenting" Family Research Council (Dale O’Leary: series of excellent articles on AIDS and same-sex attraction).


A New Zealand birth cohort study, which has followed 1,007 individuals since birth, Fergusson et al, found that, at age 21, the 28 classified as homosexual, lesbian or bisexual were significantly more likely to have had mental health problems than the 979 classed as orthosexual. The following is an excerpt from a chart included in the report:

                                                                   GLB     ORTHO
Suicidal Ideation                                        67.9%     29.0%
Suicide Attempt                                         32.1%     7.1%
Psychiatric disorders age 14 -21
Major depression                                       71.4%     38.2%
Generalized anxiety Disorder                    28.5%    12.5%
Conduct disorder                                       32.1%     11.0%
Nicotine dependence                                 64.3%     26.7%
Other substance abuse/dependence           60.7%     44.3%
Multiple disorders                                     78.6%     38.2%

In other words at age 21 the GLB (Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual) portion of the cohort has significantly more problems in every category.

The truth has never stood in the way of ideological fanatics, any more than reality has ever stood in the way of delusional psychotics.