"TRADITIONAL" MARRIAGE or TRUE MARRIAGE?

YOUR CHOICE OF WORDS DOES MATTER!

Aberrosexualist Ideological Propaganda Terms, or Newspeak, Undermine the Pro-Marriage Cause

By New Era Communications Corp., Social Communications Team

Nothing pleases more the enemies of the institution of Marriage, than hoodwinking those defending this institution into undermining it by adding adjectives that bastardize, distort, falsify and relativize it.

Anti-Marriage extremists, or aberrosexualists, understand well the impact of words on the battle’s outcome. They understand that control of words, controls thoughts. Control of thoughts, controls actions. Control of actions, controls the future. This three-fold formula by Italian Communist ideologue Antonio Gramsci is used today by aberrosexualist ideologues to force on society the macabre ideology that pushes the legalization of unhygienic, anatomically incorrect, biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choices.

Several decades ago, when aberrosexualist extremists began their totalitarian assault against traditional Western concepts of human sexuality, monogamous marriage and the family, they started off with the phrase "homosexual marriage." This phrase soon morphed into the ideological propaganda phrase “gay [sic] marriage.” It did not take long for them to develop, through extensive message testing and focus group research, a "new, improved" propaganda phrase: “marriage equality.”

Within months, aberrosexualist partisans throughout the country had substituted the phrase “gay marriage” for the new one: “marriage equality.” Pro-Marriage leaders, however, continue to naively use aberrosexualist ideological propaganda terms, or Newspeak, as well as fail to communicate that marriage comes in only one version: the true one.

Is it any wonder that pro-Marriage leaders across the nation are losing the battle? Is anyone really surprised that important sectors of the pro-Marriage camp are falling under the relentless aberrosexualist ideological propaganda bombardment?

Yet, in light of the legal and political defeats, and the alarming erosion of public support for the institution of Marriage, too many pro-Marriage leaders are in total denial of the immense damage they inflict to their cause by using enemy Newspeak. Incredibly, they refuse to acknowledge that use of enemy Newspeak is central to many of their defeats.

Many pro-Marriage leaders suicidally ignore the important role enemy Newspeak plays in controlling the thoughts that control the actions that ultimately determine the outcome of the war being waged for the heart, mind, and soul of America. Renowned Brazilian intellectual, Prof. Plinio Correa de Oliveira warned that this Newspeak, whether used by Communists of yesteryears or Aberrosexualists of today, invariably results in what he called “unperceived ideological transshipment,” or brainwashing, simply put.

By ignoring their enemy’s rhetorical firepower or Newspeak, pro-Marriage leaders are doomed to defeat before the battle even begins. All modern propaganda wars rely on the astute manipulation of language to rhetorically deceive, disarm, and ultimately destroy the enemy.

Conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh understood this well when he said: “We lost the [marriage] issue when we started allowing the word ‘marriage’ to be bastardized and redefined.” Indeed, humanity is ill-served by bastardizing and redefining marriage with adjectives that relativize and trivialize the word. There is no such thing as “hetero marriage,” “gay marriage,” “traditional marriage,” “non-traditional marriage,” “opposite-sex marriage,” or “same-sex marriage.” Marriage is either true or it’s not!

Ideological falsifications of “marriage” undermine the institution’s purpose, corrupt its meaning, and violate its essence. Respect for the institution of Marriage, therefore, demands that no adjective be added to the noun. And should we ever need to distinguish true marriage from its impostors, let’s simply refer to it as true or real marriage. All other adjectives either distort its meaning or muddy the waters.

SEVEN KEY POINTS REGARDING

THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE

1. Gay means delightful, happy, joyful; not aberrosexual or same-sex. All marriages should be gay, but not aberrosexual or same-sex. Marriage requires a husband and a wife. Two men can’t get “married” any more than they can get a hysterectomy. Two women can’t get “married” any more than they can get a prostatectomy.

2. Aberrosexualist extremists, those forcing society to accept biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choices, are not really interested in marriage. Through the flagrant judicial violation of constitutional equal protection, due process and voting rights, aberrosexualists seek to undemocratically force society to accept biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choices, or aberrosexualism, as “normal,” “healthy,” and “sane.”

3. Marriage is either TRUE or FAKE.. There’s really no such thing as “gay [sic] marriage,” “traditional marriage,” “non-traditional marriage,” “opposite-sex marriage,” or “same-sex marriage.’’ Same-sex so-called "marriage" is an ideologically-contrived legal fiction that violates true marriage’s purpose, corrupts true marriage’s meaning, and disrespects true marriage’s essence. Respect for Marriage demands that no adjectives be added to the name.

4. Since the dawn of civilization, the marital embrace, or sexual intercourse, i.e., the penetration of opposite sexual organs*, is required to legally consummate a marriage. Because it’s biologically impossible for two same-sex individuals to have sexual intercourse, or maritally embrace, the ideologically-contrived legal fraud (a fraud created to impose an ideology), of same-sex so-called “marriage” is just that, a fraud and a hoax!

5. In plain English, discrimination means treating unequally those who are equal. In America, marriage license applications never ask anyone’s sexual behavioral choices or preferences. Full marriage equality is a reality in all 50 states as all Americans enjoy the same equal right to marry under the same equal rules and conditions. Can anyone sanely say two men or two women equal one man and one woman? Treating two men or two women differently from one man and one woman can never be discrimination.

6. The institution of Marriage is a matter of public policy, not constitutional law. No U.S. Supreme Court holding, precedent or authority exists to strike down a state’s constitutional or statutory respect for the institution of Marriage as the union of one man and one woman. None! Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito states in United States v. Windsor (12-307), (2013): “same-sex marriage presents a highly emotional and important question of public policy – but not a difficult question of constitutional law.”

7. There is absolutely no constitutional right to same-sex so-called “marriage”. In United States v. Windsor, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito wrote: “The Constitution does not guarantee the right to enter into a same-sex marriage. Indeed, no provision of the Constitution speaks to the issue.” 

* Those that engage in anatomically incorrect, biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choices may argue that penile penetration of another man’s rectum somehow constitutes sexual intercourse. The rectum, however, is not a sexual organ. The rectum is a gastrointestinal organ. Sexual intercourse requires the penetration of opposite sexual organs, not the penetration of the rectum or any other non-sexual organ, object or thing.

Please share this with your relatives, friends, and neighbors.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 REMEMBER 
The truth has never stood in the way of ideological fanatics, any more than reality has ever stood in the way of delusional psychotics.

© 2014 New Era Communications, Inc.

 

FIVE QUESTIONS NEEDING IMMEDIATE ANSWER

 

Aberrosexualist Zealots Are Forcing Their Macabre Ideology on Society Through Bullying, Intimidation and Threats of Violence.

STOP the Slurs, the Discrimination and Hate!

Can the Hate-Loaded “Homophobe” Slur Ever Be Tolerated?

By Dr. Judy Meissner 

Unlike aberrosexualism, or anatomically incorrect, biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choices, ''homophobia'' has never been recognized as a mental disorder in the psychological profession’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Rather, “homophobia” is a disrespectful, non-scientific, non-medical term astutely invented to attack and incite violence against everyone who disagrees with anatomically incorrect, biologically aberrant or morally deviant sexual behavioral choices, or aberrosexualism.

Yes, “homophobe” is a hate-loaded slur used by bigots to discriminate, hurt, stigmatize, and offend everyone who expresses disagreement with the hateful Aberrosexualist ideology and its macabre social and political agenda. This slur is as despicable as any other ethnic, racial or sexist slur. It has no place in civil, respectable public discourse and it should be understood that is never acceptable. Never!

Use of the disrespectful “homophobe” slur to denigrate the universal rejection of biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choices, or aberrosexualism, is a unjustified verbal act of aggression against humanity and violates our basic right to have language used in a truthful, respectful and depoliticized manner.

''Homophobia'' does not mean an “irrational fear of” or “discrimination against” aberrosexuals or those who engage in biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choices. "Homo" means MAN, not "homosexual" or "homosexualism," and "phobia" means "irrational or pathological fear of", not "discrimination against" anything. If anything, “homophobia” is the irrational or pathological fear of other human beings, not the sane and rational rejection of aberrant sexual behavioral choices or the sane and rational disagreement with the Aberrosexualist ideology. 

Desensitizing Bigotry and Hate

It's easy for those desensitized by bigotry to shrug off the “homophobe” slur as just another word, and dismiss everyone who gets upset over it as being “too sensitive.” Interestingly, few would make the same argument with the N-word. That's because we recognize what a loaded term it is, bound up in centuries of painful history of discrimination and violence.

Using a slur hurled by extremists seeking to force society to accept as “normal" biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choices and making disrespectful comments against everyone who disagrees with them isn't any different. Both are the kind of thing that tells us more about the individual using the slur than the people they utter them about. It makes them look like a bigot; it makes them look ignorant.

One of the things that unite bigots, racists and, of course, Aberrosexualist extremists, is their inability to perceive of other human beings as equals deserving the same civility and respect they'd want for themselves. They also forget that slurs, insults and offences are the arguments of those that have no arguments. Perhaps that’s why aberrosexualist hatemongerers invariably resort to slurs, insults and offences against everyone who disagrees with them. In the end, they must recognize that those who demand respect one must first extend it to others.

The Consequences of Inciting Violence with the “homophobe” Slur

The truth is that everyone assaulted or murdered by an Aberrosexualist fanatic is a victim of continued abuse of this ugly, hate-loaded slur. The next person assaulted or murdered because of their alleged or perceived “homophobia,” their blood trial will lead directly to those who recklessly use the “homophobe” slur.

They will be held accountable for creating the climate of hate, bigotry and intolerance that feeds this aggression and violence. We must put an end to this condemnable climate before others get hurt or worse, killed, as happened to Mary Stachowicz, a 51-year-old Polish language translator, whose lifeless body was found in a crawl space beneath her murderer’s Chicago apartment. Mary was murdered by an aberrosexual neighbor who considered her a “homophobe,” and therefore felt justified in killing her.

What about Aberrosexualism (homosexualism)? Is it a mental disorder? Yes, it was always recognized as mental disorder in the DSM until it was deviously suppressed in December of 1973 as a result of Aberrosexualist intimidation and threats of violence. Aberrosexualism was never suppresed from the DSM as the result of clinical studies, scientific findings, or medical research.* Yet ironically, Aberrosexualist extremists go berserk whenever anyone points out or even implies that aberrosexualism is a psycho-sexual mental disorder.

Let's be very clear, “homophobe” and "homophobia" are ugly, hate-loaded slurs used to unjustly discriminate, ridicule and incite violence and hate. They are never acceptable. Civility demands they be stamped out.

* SOURCE: << On December 14, 1973 the Board of Trustees of the American Psychiatric Association, meeting in Washington, D.C., eliminated homosexualism from the official Diagnostic and Statistical Manual without presenting substantive evidence for such a drastic revision of basic concepts of healthy vs. unhealthy sexual development. >>

http://www.narth.com/docs/annals.html

Please share this vital information with your elected officials, judges, attorneys, relatives, friends, and neighbors.

---

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

REMEMBER
Truth has never stood in the way of ideological fanatics, any more than reality has ever stood in the way of delusional psychotics.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

WARNING! The Word "Gender" Is Being Prostituted for Ideological Purposes!

Should you say “gender” or “sex”?

Why Does It Matter? What difference does it make?

By Dr. Judy Meissner

WHY DO PARTISANS of the macabre ideology pushing the normalization and bizarre “celebration” of anatomically and biologically aberrant, morally deviant sexual behavioral choices, or aberrosexualism, refer to people's sex by the incorrect, unscientific, grammatical term “gender” rather than the correct, scientific term “sex”? Is there more here than meets the eye? Is this another brazen abuse and manipulation of language by ideological extremists?

Rather than being a means of communicating the truth, language today is being used to control and manipulate people for ideological ends. The mediating character of language is being increasingly corrupted. Through propaganda and an unethical fakestream media, extremist ideologies are systematically destroying and distorting words. They present us apparent realities whose fictive character falsify, misinforms, and destroys the very meaning of things.

SEX vs. GENDER

Sex is the objective, scientific name for the biological and physiological reality of male and female. Sex is a precisely determinable genetic fact; a scientifically demonstrable biological reality referring to persons or animals. As such, like it or not, sex can never be altered or changed. While an individual's physical appearance can be cosmetically changed or modified, or they can change their personal opinion as to their sex; their DNA or chromosomes can never be altered.

By contrast, “gender” is the grammatical category or class of nouns and pronouns in languages. Words and objects have a "gender," human beings have a sex. However, aberrosexualist ideologues, those seeking to legitimize and normalize anatomically and biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choices, have cavalierly morphed the term “gender” into an ideological euphemism denoting an individual’s personal opinion or self-perception of their sex. So “gender” is now being pushed as a propaganda term to conceal the unchangeable, biological reality of sex. Even the Oxford English Dictionary admits that “gender” is an ideologically imposed “euphemism” for a human being’s sex, intended “to emphasize the social and cultural, as opposed to the biological distinctions between the sexes.”

SCIENCE vs. SUPERSTITION

In its most recent “Media Reference Guide,” or style manual, the Gay (sic) and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) insists that sex is "the classification of people as male or female" at birth, based on bodily characteristics such as chromosomes, hormones, internal reproductive organs, and genitalia. Gender is "one's internal, personal sense of being a man or woman (or a boy or a girl).”

To justify their ideological prejudices, biases and superstitions, feminists and aberrosexualists ludicrously argue that “gender” is totally undetermined by and has absolutely nothing to do with sex. Read, for example, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution, an important and widely influential aberrosexualist/feminist text.

By using the term “gender,” aberrosexualist and feminist ideologues push the superstition that sex depends not on scientifically demonstrable, genetically provable, biological characteristics and features, but on someone’s fantasy to be whatever sex they wish or feel they are. This conveniently lets aberrosexualists and feminists acknowledge the natural differences in the sexes, differences they simply cannot deny without appearing insane, while they illogically attack the so-called “gender inequalities” they claim need to be abolished.

BIOLOGICAL REALITY vs. BEHAVIORAL PREFERENCE

Evolutionary psychologist Michael E. Mills is among the many scientists who have openly condemned the use of the ideological euphemism “gender” rather than the objective words "sex" or “sexual.” Mills suggested in 2011 that the sex/gender distinction is inappropriate, misleading and counter-productive because it erroneously presupposes that an individual’s sex can be partitioned into objective, biological factors, on the one hand, and, freely-chosen behavioral preferences or subjective psychological opinions, on the other.

THE BOTTOM LINE

“Gender” is the unscientific, ideological euphemism-of-choice of aberro/feminist ideologues; "sex" or "sexual" are the scientific, objective words used by normal, unbiased, plain-speaking people. “Gender identity” and “gender expression” are non-scientific, ideological terms, i.e., terms pushing an ideological position. Both terms are difficult if not impossible to scientifically interpret and define.

You reinforce your opponents' lies and confusion whenever you use aberrosexualist propaganda terms or expressions like "biological male," "biological female," or "gender.” As far as the facts are concerned, a so-called ‘biological male’ is and always will be a male, and a so-called "biological female" is and always will be a female. Yes, people can cosmetically alter their physical appearance, but they can never change the chromosomes that make them a man or a woman until the day they die.

It is contrary to sound public policy to grant people the false so-called “right” to legally disregard and openly misrepresent their sex as this automatically forces on us the insane idea that people can disregard and misrepresent their age, color, race, or any other biological reality.

MUTUALLY EXCLUDING FACTS

The irony of it all is that the same jokers that adamantly insist you believe that one’s sexual behavioral choices are genetically hard-wired, a part of one’s very identity, and can never be changed, dogmatically insist you also believe the modern-day superstition that one’s biological sex is fluid, socially constructed and can be changed to please one's preference.

Just because aberrosexualist ideologues use propaganda terms and expressions to fool the public into falling for their lunacy, doesn't mean honest, responsible people should use them also. Our discourse should be completely free of all aberrosexualist Newspeak. You start winning the Culture War by speaking truthfully and calling things by their correct name. Your choice of words does matter!

WORDS HAVE A GENDER. HUMANS HAVE
AN UNCHANGEABLE SEX.

 Please share this vital information with your elected officials, judges, attorneys, relatives, friends, and neighbors.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

REMEMBER
Truth has never stood in the way of ideological fanatics, any more than reality has ever stood in the way of delusional psychotics.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

YOUR LANGUAGE SHOULD REFLECT REALITY ...

The Unspeakables: 11 Words Those Who Honor the Truth Never Use

By New Era Communications Corp., Social Communications Team

Words Frame Thoughts. Thoughts Control Actions.

Actions Determine the Future.

<<<  Never Underestimate the Power of Words  >>>

Because the power and the force of words determine the outcome of any debate…

ONE. People who speak truthfully never say “gay” instead of aberrosexual or one whose sexual behavioral choices deviates from what is natural, normal or biologically correct. Why? Does anyone really believe that an individual that engages in biologically incorrect sexual behavioral choices, or an aberrosexual, is actually happy or gay?

TWO. People who speak truthfully never say “gay lifestyle” instead of biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choice or conduct. Why? Would anyone ever say the adulterer, shoplifter, or drunk-driving "lifestyle”?

THREE. People who speak truthfully never say “gay community” instead of aberrosexual population. Why? Would anyone ever say the “adulterer community,” the “thieves’ community” or the “spouse abusing community”?

FOUR. People who speak truthfully never say “gay marriage” instead of aberrosexual so-called “marriage” or phony “marriage.” Why? Is there more than ONE kind of marriage, i.e., the real deal? Two men can’t get “married” any more than they can get a hysterectomy. Two women can’t get “married” any more than they can get a prostatectomy. Phony, make-believe, ideologically-forced, aberrosexual so-called "marriage" is a fraud that undermines REAL Marriage by attacking Marriage’s purpose, corrupting Marriage’s meaning, and disrespecting Marriage’s very essence. Respect for Marriage demands that no adjectives be added to it.

FIVE. People who speak truthfully never say “traditional marriage,” instead True Marriage or just Marriage. Why? Everyone is ill-served by bastardizing and redefining the institution of Marriage by adding adjectives to the word “Marriage.”  There is no such thing as “natural marriage,” “gay marriage,” “traditional marriage,” “non-traditional marriage,” “opposite-sex marriage,” or “same-sex marriage.’’ There is just marriage, i.e., true marriage. All other wannabes are fake “marriage.”

SIX. People who speak truthfully never say “homosexual” or “homosexuality,” instead aberrosexual or aberrosexualism, i.e., anatomically incorrect, biologically aberrant or incorrect sexual behavioral choices. Why? Because “homosexual” or “homosexuality” are ideological propaganda terms crafted in the 1860s by aberrosexual extremist Karl-Maria Kertbeny seeking a clinically-sounding, nonjudgmental substitute for the then popular terms sodomite/sodomy or pervert/sexual perversion.

SEVEN. People who speak truthfully never say “heterosexual” or “heterosexuality.” Instead, they say orthosexual or orthosexuality, i.e., anatomically and biologically correct sexual behavior or human sexuality. Why? Because "heterosexual" or “heterosexuality” are ideological propaganda terms crafted in the 1860s by aberrosexual extremist Karl-Maria Kertbeny seeking a clinically-sounding, nonjudgmental substitute for the then popular word normal sexual behavior or sexuality.

EIGHT. People who speak truthfully never say “sexual orientation” (SO) instead of sexual behavioral choice. Why? Because SO is a nonmedical, nonscientific modern-day superstition. SO is a propaganda term used to deceptively create the impression that biologically aberrant sexual behavioral choices, or aberrosexualism, are somehow genetic or immutable. There is not a shred of evidence that anyone is born an aberrosexual, any more than they are born an adulterer, or a pederast, or a prostitute, etc. No one is condemned by Nature to behave aberrosexually or to engage in abnormal, unhygienic, health injurious, and medically harmful sexual practices.

NINE. People who speak truthfully never say “gender” when referring to a person’s sex. Why? Because “gender” is the category or class of nouns and pronouns in languages. Words have a "gender." Human beings have a sex. The term “gender” is an ideological propaganda term used to conceal the unchangeable, non-fluid, biological reality of sex. This conveniently lets aberrosexualists and feminists to acknowledge the natural differences in the sexes, differences they simply cannot deny without appearing insane, while illogically attacking the so-called “gender inequalities” they claim need to be abolished.

TEN. People who speak truthfully never use “aberrosexual,” i.e., an individual that engages in biologically incorrect sexual behavioral choices, where the BETTER term is aberrosexualist, i.e., a partisan, whether aberrosexual or not, of the extremist, antisocial, anti-Life, anti-Family, and rabidly anti-Christian Aberrosexualist ideology that opposes the traditional Western concepts of human sexuality, monogamous marriage and the family.

ELEVEN. People who speak truthfully never tolerate the slurs of “homophobia,” “homophobe” or “homophobic.” Why? Because these are non-medical, non-scientific pejorative terms used to demean and ridicule everyone who disagrees with biologically incorrect, aberrant, deviant, or unnatural pseudo sexual behavioral choices, i.e., with Aberrosexualism, bisexualism, fetishism, homosexualism, lesbianism, necrophilism, sadomasochism, zoophilism, etc.

One thing is clear: if you underestimate the power and the force of words your opponents will always outmaneuver you! Your terminology must communicate concepts with clarity and precision if you are to establish and develop a constructive and productive dialog with a confused and disoriented contemporary society. Without accurate, truthful terms, persuading contemporary society is a very difficult, self-defeating task.

Please share this vital information with your family, friends, and neighbors.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

REMEMBER
Truth has never stood in the way of ideological fanatics, any more than reality has ever stood in the way of delusional psychotics.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

SEXUAL (sic: gender) IDENTITY / EXPRESSION – Definition

sexual identity / expression 

sex·u·al  i·den·ti·ty  / ex·pres·sion  \ sɛksjʊəl īˈdentitē/ / ikˈspreSHən/

Noun.

1.  (Political Newspeak) A clever, non-medical, non-scientific, unverifiable, ideological term, i.e., a term pushing an ideological agenda. Ideologues insist that it means: having, or being perceived as having, a sexual-related self-identity, self-image, appearance, expression or behavior, whether or not such sexual-related characteristics differ from those associated with the person's actual, DNA-set sex.”  

2. An individual’s arbitrary personal opinion or self-perception of their sex. The inaccurate, unscientific, ideological euphemism-of-choice aberro/feminist ideologues use to conceal or mask the unchangeable, biological reality of an individual’s sex.

Some Examples:

1. Jason has not yet decided on his sexual identity or expression.

2. Aberrosexualists and other extremists demand to be granted special “rights” based on whatever sexual identity or expression they choose.

3. Sexual identity or expression is a baseless ideological propaganda term.

4. You know something is wrong when extremists tell you that sexual identity or expression can be arbitrarily changed.

---

BACKGROUND: How does the American Psychiatric Association define “sexual identity and expression”? On December 1, 2012, the Board of Trustees for the American Psychiatric Association approved the final draft of the fifth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manuel of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). The Sexual Identity Disorder Category (intended by its authors to mean “disordered” sexual identity) is renamed to Sexual Dysphoria (from a Greek root for distress), though widely misreported as “removal” of SID from the classification of disorders, it still describes transition itself as symptomatic of mental illness. Furthermore, the DSM-5 has been expanded to include Transvestic Disorder (formerly Transvestic Fetishism) category.

It is contrary to rational, sound public policy to grant anyone the false, so-called “right” to legally disregard and openly misrepresent their sex. This automatically forces on society the insane idea that an individual can somehow disregard and misrepresent their age, color, race, or any other immutable, biological reality.

SEXUAL INTERCOURSE – Definition

sexual intercourse
sex·u·al in·ter·course / sekSHo͞oəl intərˌkôrs /

Noun.

1. Coitus between a male and a female; penile-vaginal penetration; male-female genital contact or coupling involving the anatomical penetration of the female’s vagina by the male’s penis.

2. (Zoology) the act carried out for procreation or for pleasure in which, typically, the insertion of the male's erect penis into the female's vagina is followed by rhythmic thrusting usually culminating in orgasm.